The Leadership of Fools

I’m saying that when the President does it, that means it’s not illegal!
Richard Milhous Nixon

It has been said that a nation can be judged by the way it treats foreigners within its borders. But more importantly, a nation can and should be judged by its elected leaders and their actions. I intend to go through approximately fifty years of elected non-leaders known as President of the United States and examine some of their actions. The side of the aisle which they claim to align themselves with is irrelevant, because they’re all members of the same fraternity. Partisanship will take no part with regard to their acts because there is really only one side of the aisle. A simple evaluation of the poor conduct, policies and/or actions of these individuals should suffice.

I must reiterate, I will dwell on the bad and not the good; the good actions of a leader are by far outweighed by the bad. Our leaders, in this case the President of the United States, should be held to a higher standard than the rest of the population. If a leader acts in a corrupt or malevolent fashion, then this is where the focus will be directed. I believe this should actually prove to be quite interesting. Article II, Section 4, of the Constitution states, “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Their action or inaction and lack of leadership skills will be bared for all to see. This will show what type of man each president was. This should also shed some light on what the problem with the United States is, our leadership and government, as well as our own stupidity, for allowing this to continue.

Politicians and diapers should be changed frequently, and all for the same reason.
José María Eça de Queiroz

Lyndon Baines Johnson was the 36th President from November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969. He was elected to one term and he assumed the presidency after the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 22, 1963.

Johnson was a Texas Democrat and his involvement in the Suite 8F Group; a right-wing political activist group which was concerned with their ability to secure and maintain massive profits in the oil, reconstruction and armaments industries, amongst others, is a good place to start. An article in Spartacus Educational states, “Several…Texas politicians became involved in the Suite 8F Group, a collection of right-wing businessmen (1).” A quick laundry list of the members of this group included Brown & Root, chairman of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, American General Insurance Company, Cameron Iron Works, Quintana Petroleum, the Governor of Texas (who was also the owner of the Houston Post), Great Southern Life Insurance, Pure Oil Pipe Line, Humble Oil, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, Majority Leader of the Senate (Lyndon Johnson) and other Texas politicians and lawyers.

“Suite 8F helped to coordinate the political activities of other right-wing politicians and businessmen based in the South.” This list included but is not limited to the Secretary of the Navy and Treasury, Bell Helicopters, chairman of the Committee of Manufacturers, Committee on Armed Forces and Committee on Appropriations, Chairman Judiciary Committee, Chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, political lobbyists as well as Oil and Gas Companies. The report goes on to state, “The discovery of oil in Texas made a small group of men a great deal of money. They decided to join together to maintain profits. This included strategies for keeping the price of oil as high as possible.” These companies and men did indeed maintain profits. If you look at the companies themselves as well as the individuals involved, what you will find is an inappropriate relationship between government and private businesses in which contracts were awarded over a period of time spanning decades. This is a perfect example of cronyism designed to bilk the U.S. taxpayers out of money and transfer that money into the pockets of an incestuous cabal of criminals and criminal organizations whose appearance seems to be above the law.

So it would appear that government officials and private businesses joined forces to form their own little monopoly, fix prices, secure contracts and amass great sums of wealth. This is a part of the U.S. Constitution I must have glazed over, because I don’t remember reading that anywhere in the U.S. Constitution. The report goes on to name companies and individuals who decided where tax dollars were spent, who acquired contracts and how Johnson set up the committee to investigate lobbying in this area.

Interestingly enough, not all politicians were in favor of this type of behavior. Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote in his diary and called this immoral lobbying, “The most flagrant type of lobbying,” and called those involved, “So arrogant and so much in defiance of acceptable standards of propriety as to risk creating doubt among the American people concerning the integrity of governmental processes.” Of course none of this actually ended even after the scandal with General Dynamics in 1963 over the $7 billion contract for a fighter jet. Johnson simply got in bed with a Standard Oil Company heiress by selecting her husband Paul Nitze as Navy Secretary.

If you look at Johnson’s escalation of the Vietnam War, his cronies were beneficiaries of contracts and they did make huge sums of money. These companies included the newly formed “RMK-BRJ to obtain these contracts…RMK-BRJ did 97% of the construction work in Vietnam…Brown & Root (Halliburton) alone obtained revenues of $380 million from its work in Vietnam.” And of course let’s not forget about Bell Helicopter, “By 1969 Bell Helicopter Corporation was selling nearly $600 million worth of helicopters to the United States Military.”

By all appearances, Johnson’s involvement in the Vietnam War cost over 58,000 men their lives and wounded another 153,000 plus men and all for the sole purpose of lining the coffers of certain companies which were involved with Suite 8F. Just how the American public allowed this is beyond me. I do realize there was a great deal of protesting against the war and the government for these shady dealings, but this type of governmental behavior has not been stopped. Johnson should have been in a prison cell long before he became president, he was one of the biggest crooks in the history of the United States government in general, not to mention in the White House.

Operation Northwoods (2) is an interesting topic. A declassified document from the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962 clearly spells out the available options for a false-flag event in Cuba, whose outcome would have given a seemingly justified military option to the Kennedy administration. Vice President Johnson must have known about the proposal but Kennedy nixed the plan. This undoubtedly enraged Johnson who probably saw millions of dollars flying out the window of Suite 8F rather than a long and needless war being averted. Of course, Johnson signed NSAM 273 (3) a day after Kennedy’s burial, which undid JFK’s NSAM 263 (4). While Johnson didn’t get his war in Cuba, there was no way Johnson was going to allow a pullout from Vietnam. He needed the Vietnam War to make himself and his confederates in the Suite 8F Group even more powerful and wealthy than they already were; the Johnson administration dramatically increased U.S. military involvement in Indochina so U.S. taxpayer dollars could flow freely into Suite 8F.

It’s not too difficult to think the Gulf of Tonkin incident was in fact a false-flag event. Johnson needed a reason to get the U.S. military fully involved in Vietnam and probably had a few favors to pay off to his CIA opportunistic cohorts who did Johnson’s dirty work with regard to the assassination of JFK. I believe Johnson would have gleefully jumped at the chance to carry out Operation Northwoods, so why not the Gulf of Tonkin? The U.S. government would have us believe one machine-gun round which struck the U.S.S. Maddox and the subsequent phantom torpedoes which were supposedly fired at both the U.S.S. Maddox and the U.S.S. C. Turner Joy were the just cause for the escalation of troops in Vietnam, even though U.S. Navy fighter jets from the U.S.S. Ticonderoga already got payback for the one round that hit the Maddox.

An interview with a former CIA agent E. Howard Hunt, hints at V.P. Johnson’s involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy. Mr. Hunt described Johnson as, “An apparent opportunist and a corrupt president capable of doing evil deeds (5).” It was Johnson who stood to gain the most from JFK’s assassination and Mr. Hunt clearly stated, “There was nobody with the leverage that LBJ had, no competitor, he was the Vice President and if he had wanted to get rid of the President, he had the ability to do so by corrupting certain people in the CIA.” There is also the rumor of RFK accusing Johnson of killing his brother. RFK described Johnson perfectly, “Our President was a gentleman a human being, this man is not. He’s a mean, bitter, vicious animal (6).”

Besides Johnson’s link to the probable murder of JFK, Johnson is also linked to the murder of eight other people, Henry Marshall, George Krutilek, Ike Rogers and his secretary, Harold Orr, Coleman Wade, LBJ’s sister Josefa Johnson and John Kinser, Josefa’s boyfriend.

After Billy Sol Estes release from a Texas prison, when he stated, “I’ve done the crime, I’ve done the time and I did it alone (7).” His attorney, Douglas Caddy was trying to make a deal for Estes which included immunity, lifting parole restrictions, the elimination of tax liens and a pardon. Caddy claimed Estes had no part in any of the murders, only the cover-ups, and if he hadn’t he would have been murdered himself. Caddy was trying to persuade Mr. Trott, the Assistant AG for the Dept. of Justice, that Estes who was part of a conspiracy with LBJ, Cliff Carter and Malcom Wallace, would provide important information regarding nine murders, recordings of the conversations with LBJ and Wallace regarding an illegal cotton allotment scheme and illegal payoffs to LBJ and Wallace worth millions of dollars, and payoffs which came from the Brown’s, of Brown and Root, that went directly to LBJ.

It’s also not much of a stretch to think Kennedy’s desire to shut down the CIA had something to do with his assassination. If JFK had succeeded in shutting down the CIA, Johnson wouldn’t have had his operatives to create havoc in foreign nations to bolster a U.S. military response which was always lucrative for LBJ and his Suite 8F cohorts. Just look at the Vietnam War and the companies who made the money. They are all still around today, perhaps under a different name, but the same families are still involved. Johnson also would have lost a valuable source of CIA wet-boys to do his murderous undertakings.

Then there is JFK’s Executive Order 11110. I don’t doubt the idea of fixing U.S. monetary policy and going back to what the U.S. Constitution says in Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 with regard to coining money irritated many in the banking industry and the FED. Personally, I think it would have benefitted LBJ and his Suite 8F Group family. There is also the fact that Johnson didn’t stop that Executive Order, but it was somehow conveniently ignored. It was finally stopped by Reagan. But I do believe Johnson could have cared less for the Republic of the U.S., what he cared about was money.

Johnson’s communication empire should also be talked about. While it is true his wife Lady Bird bought the KTBC radio station in 1943, Johnson used his power and his influence to sway FCC decisions in the matter, “In 1943…the Federal Communications Commission, which reviewed all broadcast-license transfers, was close to being abolished…Johnson used his political influence in both Congress and the White House to prevent that from happening (8).” This is another example of Johnson’s cronyism or nepotism in this case, as this time it was his wife who was the beneficiary. Lady Bird and KTBC were on the fast-track with the influence of LBJ. They got permission to broadcast 24 hours a day, they got a better spot on the dial, their power was quintupled so they could reach over 63 counties rather than the previous 38. Then there was the strong-armings and the shake-downs of other companies who feared the government and Johnson himself. KTBC became an affiliate of CBS radio, advertising soared in a quid pro quo or else, type of situation where companies which needed local military bases not to be shut down had to play ball. There were also his television stations which were a big part of Johnson’s media empire.

Johnson knew if he could control the media, then he would have that much more power. The evidence clearly shows how President Johnson used his power from long before his presidency and during his administration to aggrandize his own wealth and the wealth of his accomplices. Johnson is a perfect example of abject greed and a self-serving political leader whose main concern was only to his bank account and to the bank accounts of his confederates, and not the People of the nation which he was supposed to serve.

I really don’t think I need to continue with President Lyndon Baines Johnson. Between the Suite 8F Group, his involvement in Vietnam for gain, his ties to nine different murders, Operation Northwoods, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, his nepotism and his strong-arming of companies to grow his own personal empire clearly show how Johnson was the epitome of greed and cronyism, and a disgusting example of any type of leader, politician or president. LBJ is an example of a man who would do absolutely anything necessary for his own personal gain.

What really strikes me as funny is, President Johnson actually stood to gain the most from the assassination of President Kennedy and he in fact did! But people just don’t want to talk about that, it’s easier to sweep it under the rug. Although much more information has been coming to light in recent years, the truth will probably never be known.

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
Mark Twain

Richard Milhous Nixon was the 37th President from January 20, 1969 to August 8, 1974. He was elected to two terms and he was the only president to resign the office. On July 27, 1974 the House Judiciary Committee passed the first 3 articles of impeachment against Nixon. He faced almost certain impeachment by the Senate and removal from office. Nixon’s resignation speech was on August 8, 1974 and he vacated the Office of President on August 9, 1974. Nixon was pardoned a month later by President Ford, on September 8, 1974.

The logical place to start talking about Nixon, a California Republican, would be with the Huston Plan. While the Huston Plan was never actually initiated, it was implemented by government agencies. What the White House wanted was, “A thorough coordination of all American intelligence agencies; he [Nixon] wanted to know what the links were between foreign groups – al-Fatah; the Arab terrorists; the Algerian subsidy center – and domestic street turbulence (9).”

The committee which was formed had J. Edgar Hoover, the Director of the FBI as the Chairman, “The committee report confronted the issue…and it laid out a number of other “further steps,” many of which were illegal. The report recommended increasing wiretapping, and microphone surveillance of radicals-relaxing restrictions on mail covers and mail intercepts; carrying out selective break-ins against domestic radicals and organizations; lifting age restrictions on FBI campus informants; and broadening NSA’s intercepts of the international communications of American citizens.”

The GlobalSecurity article states, “The president sent word back to Huston, through Haldeman, of his approval, but did not initiate any paperwork.” This could be one instance where Nixon lived up to his nickname Tricky Dicky. Nixon did verbally implement the plan through Haldeman to Tom Huston who had the task of implementation, but Nixon didn’t leave a paper trail. Hoover wouldn’t act on this unless the A.G., Mitchell put the order in writing.

The report went on to state, “Ultimately, the president voided the plan, but not before NSA had become directly involved in the seamier side of life.” While it is understandable the Nixon administration wanted information on terrorist groups such as The Weathermen and al Fatah, by not following the procedures for obtaining a court order for wiretaps or search warrants, and by attempted NSA targeting to secure U.S. national’s communications and his desire to disseminate the intelligence to other agencies was a clear violation of the law, namely the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. But this has been done since the Johnson administration with at least Bush 43 and Obama that we know of for certain.

Even though the plan was scrapped, “Four days before it was due, plans had gone to the directors of the FBI, CIA, DIA and the NSA.” The Huston Plan was, “Placed in a White House safe…became public in 1973…and uncovered…evidence that Nixon had ordered the NSA to illegally monitor American citizens.” This obviously led to Nixon’s downfall. His statement, “I’m not a crook” is a perfect example of a political leader who was in denial and thinking he was above the law and not bound by any sense of moral decency.

This sounds suspiciously like what we are experiencing today in 2014, a suspension of Constitutional Rights, Constitution-free zones, out of control government activity, intelligence agencies spying on their own citizens, other governmental agencies which are used to threaten and intimidate without any type of just cause, which is just another way of saying illegal activities. And on top of all that, we have a president who believes that if he does it, then it isn’t illegal. History really does repeat itself.

The Watergate scandal is another one of Nixon’s blunders. According to Wikipedia, “The Watergate burglaries, which took place on May 28 and June 17, 1972, were the focus of the Watergate scandal (10).” This scandal was the result of, “The arrest of five men for breaking and entering into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) head-quarters at the Watergate complex.”

The FBI was able to connect, “Cash found on the burglars to a slush fund used by the Committee for the Re-Election of the President.” An investigation by the Senate Watergate Committee later found Nixon had been recording conversations in the Oval Office, “Recordings from these tapes implicated the president, revealing he had attempted to cover up the break-in.” The report further states, “Liddy’s team placed wiretaps on the telephones on the DNC Chairman Lawrence O’Brien and Executive Director of Democratic States’ Chairman R. Spencer Oliver, Jr (11).” Subsequently, seven men were indicted, “For conspiracy, burglary, and violation of Federal wiretapping laws.”

While there is much more to this scandal, Nixon was also recording conversations in the Cabinet Room as well as other offices, plus his own private office in the Old Executive Office Building. According to a Washington Post article, “Transcripts from a telephone conversation released show President Richard M. Nixon jokingly threatened to drop a nuclear bomb on Capitol Hill in March 1974 as Congress was moving to impeach him (12).” I can only imagine what would happen if a citizen of this nation or any other nation jokingly threatened to nuke Capitol Hill or any other location within the United States. How many people are in prison today for making threats against the United States of America? Break-ins, pay-offs, recording private conversations, cover-ups and threatening to nuke Capitol Hill are not the acts of an honest man and definitely not the acts of an honest president. In fact, they are all considered to be either high crimes or misdemeanors.

Then there was the Paris Peace talks, the escalation of the Vietnam War, troops in Cambodia and Laos, what was happening in the Golden Triangle and the back-room deals to continue a war simply to win an election. The Paris Peace talks in 1968 were not going to help Nixon get elected as President of the United States, so Nixon needed the unpopular war to continue in order to keep Americans unhappy with Johnson’s war. This was done through a senior campaign advisor to Nixon, Anna Chennault. “In late October 1968 there were major concessions from Hanoi which promised to allow meaningful talks to get underway in Paris – concessions that would justify Johnson calling for a complete bombing halt of North Vietnam. This was exactly what Nixon feared (13).” Of course this sent Nixon’s team into action and Chennault had to convince the South Vietnamese to withdraw, “The South Vietnamese government should withdraw from the talks, refuse to deal with Johnson, and if Nixon was elected, they would get a much better deal.” This is truly American politics at its best.

Of course, all we have is one criminal pointing his finger at another criminal. Johnson had the FBI tap the phones of the South Vietnamese ambassador, this is how they knew what happened. Johnson was told the night before he was to cease bombing that South Vietnam was pulling out of the talks. While Nixon’s operatives called their spying on the democrats Ratfucking, I think we can see that Nixon, just as much as Johnson, were both Ratfucks.

So Nixon got his way and the Vietnam War continued. In fact, once Nixon was in office, he escalated the war and the bombing dramatically. “Once in office he escalated the war into Laos and Cambodia, with the loss of an additional 22,000 American lives…finally settling for a peace agreement in 1973 that was within grasp in 1968.” Naturally, Congress had never Declared War against North Vietnam, but this stopped neither Johnson nor Nixon.

The heroin or opium trade from the Golden Triangle in Indochina is another interesting subject with both Johnson’s and Nixon’s fingerprints neatly attached. Not that this was solely something they did, but something all administrations have engaged in since. “During the Vietnam War, operations in Laos were largely a CIA responsibility…the agency’s surrogate…Laotian general, Vang Pao, who commanded Military Region Two in northern Laos…enlisted 30,000 Hmong tribesmen in the service of the CIA (14).” So it would appear that Nixon, the President of the United States, who emphatically stated he was not a crook, was a drug dealer and a liar. The NY Times report goes on to state, “The tribesmen continued to grow…the opium poppy. Before long, someone…had established a heroin refining lab in Region Two. The lab’s production was soon being ferried out on planes of the CIA’s front airline, Air America.”

It appears as though the U.S. government, CIA and military, took over the opium trade from the previous French Intelligence Service owners, Deuxième Bureau, at some point after Diên Biên Phu in 1954. And much like the previous owners of the trade, the CIA used the monies to finance operations which are considered off the books. In other words, secret and with or without any Congressional oversight or public knowledge. I say with Congressional oversight and without public knowledge.

Obviously, nobody within government actually knows anything until it hits the newspapers. But there was more of a reason for Nixon to escalate the War other than “Ho Chi Minh is a son of a bitch,” just as the Gulf of Tonkin incident wasn’t the reason the U.S. went to Vietnam. Tonnes of valuable heroin seems like a perfect governmental position. Isn’t that what has since happened in El Salvador, Colombia, Nicaragua, Panama and Afghanistan?

There is no point continuing with Nixon. Apparently, he believed and acted as though he was above the Law of the Land or any other law for that matter. When he threatened the nation’s Capitol with a nuclear device, whether it was a joke or not, is treasonous behavior and is punishable under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution. Ordering the burglaries and illegal wiretaps of the offices of the Democrats plus his involvement in the entire Watergate conspiracy, his order to spy on sovereign U.S. citizens, back-room deals to prolong a war and trafficking in opium were all criminal activities.

All of this shows Nixon had a complete lack of moral fiber as well as a corrupt and paranoid mind. Nixon may have stated, “I am not a crook,” but his being a crook was and is Nixon’s legacy to himself and to the United States of America. Richard M. Nixon not only disgraced himself, but he disgraced the nation and the Office of the President. Nixon was a deceptive manipulator, like Johnson, whose behavior was criminal, pathetic and shameful.

The word politics is derived from the word poly, meaning many, and the word ticks, meaning blood sucking parasites.
Larry Hardiman

Gerald Rudolph Ford, Jr. (born Leslie Lynch King, Jr.) was the 38th President from August 9, 1974 to January 20, 1977. Ford was never elected President or Vice President of the United States. In October 1973, he was nominated for the office of Vice President after the resignation of V.P. Spiro Agnew and was confirmed by the Senate November 27, 1973 and by the House on December 6, 1973 and he took the Oath that day. On August 9, 1974, Ford assumed the Office of President after Nixon resigned.

Ford was a Michigan Republican who I was going to omit due to the fact he was never elected to the Office of President. But because his first order of business as the president was to pardon Richard M. Nixon on September 8, 1974, I decided to briefly touch on his presidency.

It didn’t take Ford longer than a month to pardon Nixon for his crimes, I suppose the reason was he didn’t want to lose his club privileges. One would think that anyone who attains the highest level of office in a nation would be an upright individual who only has the best interests of the nation at heart. That doesn’t seem to be the case in the United States though. Perhaps in the distant past that was true, but it certainly is not true in my lifetime.

Ford did attempt to prove he had a backbone in 1975, maybe a month after US forces withdrew from Vietnam, when the SS Mayaguez (15) was seized by the communists in what they called Cambodian waters, but what the U.S. called international waters. Either way, the result was a fiasco and nothing more than an attempt to assuage the fears of the American People that its government wasn’t spineless, and of course to show the world that U.S. resolve still existed.

I wouldn’t suggest that we shouldn’t have pounded Pol Pot and his Khmer Rouge into oblivion for seizing our ship and throwing our men in prison, but that isn’t what happened and that wasn’t why we went to Cambodia again. This was all about appearances. Many believed and viewed the U.S. as impotent after the withdrawal in South Vietnam. There are reports which state Cambodia was in the process of releasing the crew and the ship, but that didn’t matter. Ford needed to appear strong. If he had publicly told the Khmer Rouge that if they didn’t release the ship and the crew, there wouldn’t be a nation known as Cambodia anymore, I’m sure it would have sufficed. But words from the U.S. government had become nothing more than bluster to the world, which is why Ford attacked Koh Tang island.

I suppose Ford didn’t want another Pueblo incident that happened under Johnson, or the subsequent incident near the beginning of Richard Nixon’s administration when North Korea shot down a US spy plane which killed the entire crew. I still have to feel as though Ford was only trying to prove himself to the nation.

Another way to look at Ford is by the people he surrounded himself with during his presidency. Ford was the one who nominated Nelson Rockefeller as Vice President. In 1975, Ford brought in Donald Rumsfeld at Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney as White House Chief of Staff and George H.W. Bush as the Director of the CIA. Naturally, he kept Henry Kissinger as Secretary of State. It’s almost humorous how the same names reappear incestuously in U.S. government leadership.

During Ford’s re-election campaign in 1976, Ford stated, “There is no Soviet domination of eastern Europe, and there never will be under a Ford administration (16).” It’s no wonder Carter won the election. To anyone who has ever read a history book, they will tell you that statement was pure fiction. The party line was Ford misspoke, but meant to say…. The fact is, Ford was nothing more than a stumblebum who couldn’t keep his feet beneath him while walking.

I don’t even know how to sum things up with Ford, other than to say his Masonic influence (17) guided his missteps. His almost immediate pardoning of Nixon, his hasty and shameful manner of pullout from Vietnam, his handling of the Mayaguez incident, the types of individuals he surrounded himself with during his presidency and his complete and utter lack of reality with regard to the words he spoke, were that of an incompetent blunderer.

On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
H.L. Mencken

James Earl Carter, Jr. was the 39th President from January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981. He was a Georgia Democrat and he was elected to one term as president. He was considered to be the hero of the Camp David Accords, a so-called peace accord for the Middle East between Egypt and Israel in 1978.

Carter is portrayed as the champion of the peace treaty in that region, but oddly enough, peace never really happened. Carter completely overlooked the al-Fatah massacre of 37 Israeli civilians, and allowed Arafat and his PLO to find safe haven in northern Beirut. On September 29, 1977, Carter had a press conference where he spoke about the PLO, “It’s obvious to me that there can be no Middle Eastern peace settlement without adequate Palestinian representation.…” A question later in the interview had to do with the assurances given to the PLO, Carter stated, “If they accept…the right of Israel to exist, then we will begin discussions with the leaders of the PLO (18).”

Of course, the Coastal Road Massacre took place on March 11, 1978 after the press conference where Carter stated the PLO must accept the right of Israel to exist. So, on one hand, Carter the Nobel Peace Prize (2002) winning champion of peace, was the famed intermediary between Egypt and Israel, but he was willing to overlook the slaughter of Israeli civilians as long as the PLO recognized Israel’s right to exist. How disingenuous political leaders can be when they unequivocally state one thing and completely disregard that same thing at a later date, but later take credit for being a so-called champion of peace and détente.

Iranian terrorists appropriately named Imam’s Disciples raided sovereign U.S. territory known as the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, Iran on November 4, 1979. Fifty U.S. citizens and diplomats were imprisoned for 444 days. According to, Carter’s original response was, “Economic sanctions…diplomatic pressure…cancelled oil imports…he expelled a number of Iranians…followed by freezing about $8 billion of Iranian assets in the U.S..” In late April, Carter’s failed plan dubbed ‘Eagle Claw’ ended almost as soon as it began, “The aftermath, as Iranians eventually found and mockingly paraded the wreckage on worldwide television, was total humiliation for the United States (19).”

While it would appear as though Jimmy Carter was the champion of Arabs, Palestinians and Iranians, he certainly wasn’t the champion of the Americans or Israelis. Neither President Carter nor the Congress acted in an honorable fashion with regard to this Act of War. I personally believe Carter violated Article II, Section 1 by not defending and protecting the U.S. Constitution and I believe Congress violated Article I, Section 8 by not defending the United States against foreign aggression. I cannot understand why an individual with these lack of credentials was ever awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, much less elected President of the United States. But as we see far too often, our choices, if that’s what you would like to call them, are nothing more than a vote against the candidate you think is worse.

President Carter and the disaster at the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor is another Carter blunder. On March 28, 1979 a meltdown occurred at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania near Middletown. The official story was, “This was the most serious accident in U.S. commercial nuclear power plant operating history, although its small radioactive releases had no detectable health effects on plant workers or the public (20).”

Supposed studies from the NRC, EPA, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Department of Energy, the State of Pennsylvania and several independent sources stated, “Approximately 2 million people…are estimated to have received an average radiation dose…about 1 millirem…exposure from a chest x-ray is about 6 millirem…the area’s natural radioactive background dose of about 100-125 millirem per year for the area…The maximum dose…at the site boundary would have been less than 100 millirem.” This is according to the NRC.

Their conclusion regarding the health effects was the meltdown had, “Negligible effects on the physical health of individuals or the environment.” This of course is the official story which the U.S. government stood by at the time and continues to stand by to this date. Of course, history repeats itself. The Fukushima nuclear plant disaster three and a half years ago in 2011 has been swept under the rug. The official story in Japan is no problem, don’t worry about the radiation we are dumping into the Pacific, the environment, the people and the fish will be fine. What really makes me laugh is the fact that they complain about Hiroshima and Nagasaki when what happened at Fukushima will prove to be much worse in the end. The lies never change, only the liars.

According to The Institute for Southern Studies, Randall Thompson a health physics technician who was hired to monitor radiation releases (and did for 28 days at TMI) stated, “What happened at TMI was a whole lot worse than what has been reported…Hundreds of times worse (21).” Thompson and his wife, who both worked in the same capacity at TMI reported, “What they witnessed there was a public health tragedy. The Thompsons also warn that the government’s failure to acknowledge the full scope of the disaster is leading officials to underestimate the risks posed by a new generation of nuclear power plants.” These statements by the Thompsons are in direct contradiction to the official story from the Carter administration, the U.S. government in general and the NRC. And why wouldn’t they be? We should have all come to realize by now that if the government or one of their agencies speaks, then they are lying. The report also gives Thompson’s background, “A veteran of the U.S. Navy’s nuclear submarine program, he is a self-described “nuclear geek.”” This doesn’t sound like the type of individual who has an axe to grind, as the United States had perhaps, the finest nuclear Navy and had the best sailors the world ever knew (I have used the past tense, because our U.S. government has decimated our military).

That being said, Mr. Thompson doesn’t sound like the type of individual who would say, “Radiation releases from the plant were hundreds if not thousands of times higher than the government and industry have acknowledged — high enough to cause the acute health effects…that have been dismissed by the industry and the government as impossible.” The government’s failure in this case (and all other cases) leads directly to the so-called leader of the nation, the Commander in Chief, also known as the President of the United States. Clearly, our Georgia peach, President Carter didn’t deem it necessary to protect the citizens of Pennsylvania or the surrounding areas, but found it more important to maintain a misguided government and business stratagem to promote and maintain the civilian nuclear industry at any cost. I can see why Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize, the man was an absolute jewel.

A number of interviews were taken from people in the area who suffered and can be found in Three Mile Island Alert (22), Three Mile Island: The People’s Testament. The interviews don’t jibe with the government’s story of no detectable health effects to the public! I guess people will never learn not to trust the government. There are other online reading materials which can be found in PDF form at PDF Search Books (23).

I would also like to mention a notarized statement from Jane Rickover, Admiral Rickover’s daughter-in-law, which can be found at which states, “In May, 1983, my father-in-law, Admiral Hyman G. Rickover told me that at the time of the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor accident, a full report was commissioned by President Jimmy Carter. He [my father-in-law] said that the report, if published in its entirety, would have destroyed the civilian nuclear power industry because the accident at Three Mile Island was infinitely more dangerous than was ever made public. He told me that he had used his enormous personal influence with President Carter to persuade him to publish the report in a “highly” diluted form. The President himself had originally wished the full report to be made public. – In November, 1985, my father-in-law told me that he had come to deeply regret his action in persuading President Carter to suppress the most alarming aspects of that report (24).”

While President Carter’s conscience may have been urging him to fully disclose the information people needed, he allowed himself to do the wrong thing and keep vital information from the American public; that isn’t leadership, it’s cowardice and incompetence. Personally speaking, this sounds like just one more example of a government cover-up aimed at protecting the politicians we call leaders and their pet projects.

While I will admit President Carter is a good diplomat as far as bringing two disparate sides together for talks, President Carter’s actions as President of the United States was that of an utter half-wit and I can only hope he was a better peanut farmer than he was a president, because he never did anything for the United States as the president.

Carter persuaded Israel to make a pact with the Devil. Carter also cozied-up to Yasser Arafat – the little horn, and he ignored the slaughter of Israeli citizens. By all appearances, I would state Carter is wholeheartedly anti-Semitic. He utterly botched the Iran hostage crisis; his cowardice allowed the United States to be attacked without reprisal. And Carter spinelessly covered-up the disastrous Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania.

Carter’s presidency, much like every other presidency, can best be described as four wasted years which we will never get back. Carter was an incompetent and cowardly example of a president. His inaction, as well as his deceptive demeanor, reek of corruption and malfeasance. But truthfully, he was no better or worse than any of the other misfits who have occupied our White House, which says very little, but speaks volumes about the leadership of the United States.

If something can corrupt you, you’re corrupted already.
Bob Marley

Ronald Wilson Reagan was the 40th President from January 20, 1981 to January 20, 1989. He was elected to two terms and survived a failed assassination attempt on March 30, 1981.

As we now move on to Reagan, a California Republican, I cannot and should not proceed with Reagan without including George Herbert Walker Bush, the 41st President from January 20, 1989 to January 20, 1993, who was elected to one term.

Reagan was a great orator and I would like to add, I met him, I spoke with him and I liked him. But he was really nothing more than a mouthpiece for V.P. George H.W. Bush, who was a Massachusetts born Texas Republican, who was also the former Director of the CIA and Ambassador to China, amongst his other Illuminati family accomplishments.

Let’s start with the 1980 campaign for the presidency. According to a report by History Commons, “Robert Sensi, a young CIA agent with excellent contacts among prominent Arabs, the Republican National Committee opens what Sensi calls “a secret channel to Iran (25).” Sensi is not only alluding to the secret plans to sell arms to Iran…but to the “October Surprise” of the November 1980 US presidential elections.”

Both of these events have Reagan’s vice presidential candidates dirty fingerprints all over them; George Herbert Walker Bush. So the CIA and the U.S. State Department, working with the Israelis tried to persuade Carter to sell arms to Iran for consideration (release of the hostages), but Carter wouldn’t sell Iran arms. Israel on the other hand, probably at the behest of the CIA and the U.S. State Department, did sell arms to Iran. Once again we see the U.S. State Department and the CIA dragging the People of the United States down with them for no other reason than their lust for power.

The report further states, “Salem bin Laden, Osama’s eldest brother…is involved in secret Paris meetings between US and Iranian emissaries…and some have speculated that in these meetings, George H.W. Bush negotiated a delay to the release of the US hostages in Iran.” I’m obliged to note from the report, this “Points to a long-standing connection of highly improper behavior between the Bush and bin Laden families.” This sick connection becomes even much more apparent when Bush 41’s son, “George W. Bush cleared the bin Laden’s to fly out of the United States (26)” after the September 11, 2001 attacks which were supposedly orchestrated by Osama bin Laden. Of course, I no longer believe that is true. It is more likely than not, that the entire incident in New York was a plan of the U.S. government so they could get their ‘War on Terror’ which is not possible to win or end. It is nothing more than a fiction of the Illuminati, bought and sold to the unwashed masses for the purpose of creating a world-wide police state.

The report continues, “Sensi will note that CIA Director William Casey has been involved in the US’s secret dealings with Iran since the outset, as has Robert Carter, the deputy director of Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign.” And to top all of this off, Sensi’s organization Republicans Abroad gave them access to U.S. Embassies and the CIA (not that Bush 41 didn’t have access) which was capable of “conducting espionage and sabotage for the Republican Party.” Where have we heard this before? Is this Watergate part II or III or XX, who knows for certain? Democrat Johnson, Republican Nixon, Republican Bush all did this sort of thing, but it is definitely ‘Ratfucking’ as the Republican operatives like to call it.

It would appear as though Reagan was led by Bush 41 into a depraved world from the beginning of his campaign and as we will see, right through his two terms as the president, which continued into the one term of President Bush 41. An hour after Reagan was sworn into office, the hostages were freed. If the French secret intelligence report was correct, then Reagan and Bush 41 were as dirty as could be. A definite pattern has emerged regarding our government’s leadership, which crosses the aisle from the democrats to the republicans and back. Yet the People of the United States continue to be willing pawns in a game of chess where they are sacrificed time and again by those who only have their own interests at heart, with little or no regard for the country which they claim to serve.

This is not implausible, as George H.W. Bush was the Director of the CIA at one point and he knew exactly how to get things done, especially dirty business. But there is the possibility the Iranians simply didn’t want to get blown completely off the map, which is what Carter should have done in the first place, but was too spineless to do. Even though the hostages in Iran were released, there were subsequent hostages in Lebanon.

This always comes right back to the U.S. State Department and their utterly failed policy of meddling in the affairs of other nations. Reza Pahlavi, the former Shah of Iran was the State Department’s and the CIA’s puppet I am referring to here. While it is possible the Iranian people did have a certain amount of freedom under Pehlavi, the truth is, he was a greedy, self-serving dictator who was only interested in adorning himself with the lavish riches which he was able to steal from the Iranian people. I can’t believe it took the Iranians that long to depose the criminal, but who am I to talk, just look at the leaders of the United States who do the exact same thing that Pahlavi did.

According to a PBS report the arms-for-hostages proposal was somewhat divisive. But, “Reagan, McFarlane and CIA Director William Casey supported it. With the backing of the president, the plan progressed.” The report goes on to state some interesting facts, “More than 1,500 missiles had been shipped to Iran. Three hostages had been released; only to be replaced by three more, in what Secretary of State George Schultz called “a hostage bazaar (27).”” Knowing this, it cannot be difficult to assume there in fact was a shady deal to secure the release of the Iranian hostages, just not until after Reagan took office. Backroom deals which prolong the imprisonment of Americans, is highly distasteful to say the least. The illegal sale of arms to an enemy which has attacked our sovereign nation and its citizens is criminal. The payoffs to the terrorists in Lebanon was not only unfathomable but unconscionable and disgraceful. But this is the U.S. government at work, whether we like it or not.

As we have already seen, the U.S. was supplying arms to Iran, but according to many different reports, this one from Wikipedia, “Starting in 1982…the United States made its backing with Iraq more pronounced…supplying it with economic aid, counter-insurgency training, operational intelligence on the battlefield, and weapons (28).” Now the United States was funding both sides during the Iran-Iraq War. Was this a highly honorable thing to do? I will agree it is quite a plan to clandestinely supply both sides of a war, especially when you already have an antagonistic history with each side. But these actions only diminish the stature of the United States and sully the reputation of its people. The promotion of war between two nations as a result of a misguided government foreign policy agenda can only be described as subversive and malevolent. But to this day, the United States government kills with impunity, and the rest of the world sits back and feels good about the lip service their own impotent leaders proffer as their form of disgust. I would be willing to bet that within the meetings of the so-called elite, they are laughing at us all, while they toast their accomplishments and themselves.

We should at least mention the U.S. arming of rebel groups such as the Mujahideen in the 1980s. Regarding U.S. foreign policy blunders according to the blog, Ottomans and Zionists, “The most prominent one was the effort to arm the Afghani mujahideen in the 1980’s in a bid to defeat the Soviets in Afghanistan (29).” The report goes on to state, “Arming the mujahideen caused enormous blowback for the U.S., since the weapons supplied by the U.S. were ultimately turned on U.S. and NATO troops years later and the arms and training indirectly benefited al-Qaida and the Taliban down the road.” I can’t help but think this did more than just indirectly benefit al Qaeda and the Taliban. Osama bin Laden was in some way a protégé of the CIA and the U.S. State Department. We also know bin Laden was the head of al Qaeda. Just as we know the Bush family and the bin Laden family have longstanding ties. So I would agree this was in the least a foreign policy blunder to put it mildly. But this isn’t an isolated incident. This is the policy of the U.S. State Department and the Council on Foreign Relations, not that the CFR should have any sway with our government, but it does.

The blowback described by Mr. Koplow, proceeded the U.S. creation of al Qaeda and the Taliban and has happily continued with the subsequent creation of ISIS, but history tells us this has been happening for some time now. I have to ask myself if the 13th century Sedes Sacrorum (30), the Knights of the Holy See (Santa Sede), has continued to thrive? We know there was the Nazi SS, but what about the Secret Service in the US as well as others, the OSS/CIA, or the NSA/CSS; they are all Santa Sede, which is what SS really means.

They were and they are all just another arm of the Vatican’s Santa Sede (Holy See), the Sedes Sacrorum, people and organizations who gave their temporal and spiritual consent to the Papal Army of the Holy Inquisition. Look at what these people have accomplished over the years throughout the world; destruction of sovereign governments and peoples, war, famine, disease or more simply put, mayhem and death. These demons love what they do; killing is their business and business is good!

For the powerful, crimes are those that others commit.
Noam Chomsky

During the Republican National Convention in 1988, we all remember George H.W. Bush’s presidential nomination acceptance speech, “Read my lips: no new taxes.” Of course, this repeated lie didn’t last, just as they never do. The University of Virginia’s Miller Center states, “In June 1990, Bush issued a written statement to the press, reneging on his “no taxes” pledge made during the campaign (31).” Well, it’s not unusual for a politician to say one thing and then turn around and do another. Perhaps a pledge made to the People of America didn’t mean much to Bush 41. But I would suggest the Bush family’s disdain for the American People is where we should be looking and not at some policy untruth which all administrations embrace.

But raising taxes when he pledged not to raise them is really nothing compared to his bailout of the Savings and Loans industry. “In February 1989, with many S&Ls failing, Bush proposed a plan to bailout the industry…that ended up costing the taxpayers more than $100 billion.” The Miller Center did state the reasoning for the failures of the S&Ls, “The federal and state governments had deregulated the industry in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s…the industry ventured into riskier investments that destabilized it.” Basically, the Bush administration and the Congress rewarded the S&L industry for malfeasance and incompetence. The more than $100 billion it cost the taxpayers did not belong to the federal government or the S&L industry; it belonged to the People of the United States which was simply misappropriated. A bailout and a tax hike really aren’t any different; both come directly out of the pockets of the People who make this nation what it is. But it didn’t stop there. His son, Bush 43 and Obama both did the same thing years later with their friends in the banking industry, just at a much higher cost.

A report in the Inquirer Daily News states, “It will cost at least $306 billion over the next 33 years, according to a June 28 analysis by the General Accounting Office. Taxpayers will pay 51 percent, or $157 billion (32).” Eight years of Bush as the vice president and a little over one year with him as the president cost the American people a great deal of wealth and increased the deficit even higher than in the Reagan years.

According to Wikipedia, during the Bush administration in the 1990s, “Paid Halliburton subsidiary Brown & Root Services over $8.5 million to study the use of private military forces with American soldiers in combat zones. Halliburton crews also helped bring 725 burning oil wells under control in Kuwait.” Other information about Halliburton and its subsidiaries include, “In the early 1990s, Halliburton was found to be in violation of federal trade barriers in Iraq and Libya…After having pled guilty, the company was fined $1.2 million, with another 2.61 million in penalties (33).” But there’s always more, “During the Balkans conflict in the 1990s, Kellogg-Brown Root (KBR) supported peacekeeping forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Hungary…In 1998, Halliburton merged with Dresser Industries, which included Kellogg. Prescott Bush was a director of Dresser Industries, which is now part of Halliburton; his son, former President George H.W. Bush, worked for Dresser Industries in several positions from 1948 to 1951, before he founded Zapata Corporation.”

You will notice that some of the same company names reappear from where this chapter started with Lyndon Johnson. I find this to be very incestuous. I also believe this is another egregious example of a political leader, aka, a government official, lining the pockets of their confederates. It seems very odd that politicians should be believed when their blatantly apparent and subversive cronyism is so wide out in the open.

How do we know, Bush didn’t invade Kuwait to support companies with which he was aligned? Or possibly further a foreign policy agenda which lines the pockets of companies with which they were affiliated? By the way, Bush’s company Zapata was funded by the Brown brothers of Brown & Root. Are any of you starting to see the connection from one president to the next? What this is, is a cabal which spans decades of administrations; government and private corporations conspiring together to usurp the authority of the People of the United States for the gain of their own personal syndicate.

It is also important to remember that during eight years of the Reagan administration and four years of the Bush administration, U.S. military operations were conducted in El Salvador, Libya, Lebanon, Grenada, Nicaragua (but we called it war games in Honduras), Chad, Bolivia, Panama, Colombia, Peru, Philippines, the Persian Gulf, Iraq, Kuwait and Somalia. This list doesn’t include covert missions which are apparently the mainstay of the U.S. government. Who do these operations help? The military industrial complex is who; they earn hundreds of millions of dollars from these operations.

Iraq’s claim that Kuwait was drilling horizontally and sucking out Iraqi oil is something that should be mentioned, after all, the Bush family are oil men. Who do you suppose taught the Kuwaitis how to do that? They didn’t figure it out on their own, that is if the Iraqi’s claim was true.

Look at the companies which were part of the suite 8F Group and you will notice the Bush family is right there. Prescott Bush was supplying the Nazis in WWII, this tells me what type of people the Bush family really are; they are Sedes Secrorum, the Novus Ordo Seclorem, the new world order, who seek Annuit Coeptis, which is their motto – Jupiter favor our undertakings. Virgil’s epic The Aeneid is where this comes from. This is the pyramidal Nicolaitan system with their false god on top. Jupiter is a false god; he is their god-Nimrod, but he is definitely not the Living God; YEHOVAH or His Son YESHUA ha Mashiach. The Living God YEHOVAH and His Son YESHUA both hate the Nicolaitan system. These demons have put this right before our faces, all we have to do is look. By our own ambivalence and inaction, we have been and are unwittingly giving our legal consent to them.

So what do we have? Both Reagan and Bush 41 were involved in illegal arms sales. They both used the CIA to further a presidential bid. Both men had an affiliation with the bin Laden family and a secret deal to prolong the imprisonment of U.S. citizens held in Tehran. And then there was training of the Mujahideen with bin Laden as their golden boy. There were botched arms sales or payoffs to al Fatah terrorists for the release of hostages, which didn’t work. There was the clandestine and disgusting arming of two nations, Iran and Iraq, to fight in a war against each other. There was espionage and sabotage without Congressional approval. And there was either lying or just simply going back on campaign promises. There were the unbelievable and ineffectual bailouts of S&Ls who acted and operated as banks, plus a massive increase in the deficit. And there were the military operations, both overt and covert, along with the awarding of contracts to companies with which at least Bush 41 was affiliated, as well as his father, and that dated back to Suite 8F, which predates Lyndon Johnson’s presidency.

And I didn’t even mention the U.S. Marines who were killed in Lebanon due to the government’s lack of leadership skills. I should almost feel like laughing at this point, but this is just too sad for anything of that nature. But I will say, during these twelve years, the US military industrial complex thrived and so did the companies who were part of Suite 8F.

I can only conclude that Reagan’s actions were that of a great actor and a deceptive manipulator who was corrupt, while his cohort Bush was a morally bankrupt, despicable criminal who was pure evil. Bush 41 was hand-picked for his passion for corruption, his malevolent nature and his affinity to destroy. If you are curious, you can find a photograph of George H.W. Bush at the site in Dallas Texas where JFK was assassinated, on that day when it happened. Do you think that is a coincidence?

Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.
Ronald Reagan

William Jefferson Clinton (born William Jefferson Blythe III) was the 42nd President from January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001. He was elected to two terms and he was impeached on December 19, 1998 by the House of Representatives for perjury and obstruction of justice, but he was acquitted by the Senate on February 12, 1999.

Clinton was a Democrat from Arkansas who may be best known for his licentious sex acts with Monica Lewinsky, which is where I will start seeing as how I am already laughing. This information can be found at CNN Politics (34). In January of 1998, President Clinton denied having a sexual relationship (or any other type of affair or relationship for that matter) with Lewinsky, and in August of that same year, President Clinton did admit he had an inappropriate relationship with Lewinsky. On December 12, 1998, the republican controlled House impeached Clinton for lying under oath and obstruction of justice. On February 12, 1999, the democrat controlled Senate acquitted Clinton. Oh, the beauty of partisan politics!

I felt compelled to enter this because Clinton was impeached, but I personally found this entire incident to be uncalled for and quite an embarrassment to the nation. However, President Clinton should have just told everyone to mind their own business from the beginning, rather than lying about the affair. He lied under oath and he lied to the American People. Both Clinton and Lewinsky were of age and free to do as they pleased. If anything, this was a matter for Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary, not the entire world. Unfortunately, Clinton proved himself to be a liar.

Now is a good time to talk about the Branch Davidian Compound in Waco Texas in 1993. According to the Free Dictionary by Farlex, “Approximately 80 Branch Davidians died, including their leader, 34-year old David Koresh. In all, 57 Davidians died in the fire, while 23 died from gunshot wounds. Of these dead, 17 were children, some of whom died from gunshot wounds and some in the fire. Eighteen children and 22 adults left the compound unharmed during the seven-week standoff (35).”

A report from PBS stated, “On April 18, in a conversation with Reno, the President endorsed the gas plan. Although Clinton distanced himself from the matter after April 19…FRONTLINE has learned that Clinton apparently followed developments at Waco closely through some of his closest White House aides (36).” I’m shocked! Is it possible the President of the United States and the Attorney General would conspire to commit such an act? Well, with 80 dead bodies it seems hard to believe otherwise, but as we will see, this is not all that unusual.

What we have is a President of the United States ordering a raid on a legal, private compound in the United States by paramilitary forces where (I believe) at least 80 people were killed, 22 of them children. Then the president had the audacity to try to distance himself the very next day. I would suggest this makes Clinton a coward and a murderer. David Koresh could have been arrested at any time by the ATF, but they chose not to arrest him, because they wanted to destroy a religious sect in the United States. Whether or not Koresh was a wacko is beside the point. This was an attack on Christianity and freedom. What the U.S. government was doing was sending out a signal to the People of the United States that any type of belief which wasn’t part of the government’s own particular views or stratagems was to be silenced. PBS FRONTLINE, which appears not to be a partisan news organization, clearly stated they learned Clinton was closely kept abreast of the situation by his closest White House aides.

Canada Free Press reports former advisor Dick Morris stated, “Bill Clinton orchestrated that takeover.” And then further reported, “Clinton in fact was so ashamed about what he did in Waco that he was not going to appoint Janet Reno to a second four year term.” Morris then gave information from a meeting Clinton had with Reno before inauguration day when Reno stated, “If you don’t appoint me I’m going to tell the truth about Waco (37).” Reno was the Attorney General of the United States. When a statement of this low caliber comes out of the mouth of the so-called top cop in the U.S., why would anyone with a modicum of intelligence consider believing anything they have to say? But it is apparent that since the Johnson administration to this point with Clinton that what the government says and does is nothing more than a fabrication. I would offer that a U.S. politician is only lying when their mouth is open. When have you ever heard of a politician from the U.S. that wasn’t constantly chipping their teeth about something which you didn’t think was a lie? These people prove themselves to be shameless prevaricators over and over again, yet they remain in office.

Former Clinton advisor Dick Morris states on his website, “It was not anti-government rhetoric that inspired McVeigh…it was the action of the federal government during the Waco raid that incited him to violence…the attack on the Federal Office Building…on the anniversary of the Waco raid underscores the connection (38).” However, the truth about what happened was that it wasn’t McVeigh’s little truck bomb that brought that building down in Oklahoma. No doubt he was paid by the Clinton regime, but it was the Clinton administration who had that federal building brought down and we all know it.

The only thing I didn’t find in the articles I read was the description of the entire incident described as a pathetic example of Clinton’s leadership. Of course, there were the typical descriptions of Clinton as blameless and a mere bystander plus the unfairness of the press. This is the second example I have given of how Slick Willie lived up to his nickname. But it’s a shame 80 American people, 22 which were children, had to be killed for no reason. When the government and the police become murderous fascists and the People do nothing, what comes later as a result of the People’s inaction, is the fault of the People and nobody else; consent has been given, which is jurisdiction or the legal authority to act. And they do act, just not in a manner which any sane person would consider to be decent.

Clinton’s lies didn’t stop with Waco, according to Accuracy in Media, “President Clinton in his Chris Wallace interview…his claim [was] that he was involved in “trying to stop genocide in Kosovo….”” The report further states, “Clinton’s bombing…killed more people than died in this “genocide.” And his policy benefitted Osama bin Laden and the global jihad.” And there is more, “The main beneficiary…a Muslim terrorist group, the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), with links to bin Laden, who had declared war on America in 1996, bombed our embassies in Africa in 1998, and would later, of course, orchestrate 9/11 (39).” Believe it or not, this actually gets even more interesting. Former CIA agent Michael Scheuer stated, “The Clinton Administration “had eight to ten chances” to kill bin Laden and they refused to try…Clinton had a pro-Muslim foreign policy that actually benefitted bin Laden and facilitated 9/11.” Now that is what I call pathetic. And we haven’t even really touched on the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center or the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in east Africa, which were orchestrated by Osama bin Laden, the protégé of our own government.

While it is true the Mujahideen was originally trained during the Reagan/Bush administration to fight the Soviets, it would seem blatantly obvious the Clinton administration was also quite fond of Osama bin Laden. Why else would Clinton support the KLA to kill Serb Christians, or refuse to kill bin Laden when he had 8 to 10 chances? For sure, the anti-Christian and pro-muslim agenda of the U.S. government is one reason. But once again, I find myself writing the word pathetic with regard to Bill Clinton and his administration.

Mogadishu Somalia in 1993 was another one of Clinton’s low moments. “An American soldier’s bound corpse being dragged through the streets…and a videotape of a captured US pilot appeared to mark the turning point yesterday for the U.S. intervention in Somalia.” The Guardian went on to report, “The gruesome parade was a jolting reminder…of the public mangling of US soldiers’ bodies in Iran…it also recalled the…bomb which killed 241 Marines in Beirut.” The Guardian further reported, “President Bill Clinton said…any mistreatment of the captured Americans would be viewed “very gravely (40).”” How comforting Clinton can be issuing such a pathetic statement like that after the Soldier’s corpses had already been dragged through the streets by cheering crowds and videotaped. Of course, true to Slick Willie’s nature he later “has attempted to keep the worsening Somali nightmare at arm’s length.” This is another sad example of Clinton’s so-called leadership of distancing himself and doing nothing. But this is not a surprise considering Clinton was nothing more than a draft-dodging war protester who really only hated honorable men and the United States. His wife Hillary echoed this almost two decades later when her complete disregard for Americans and her subsequent inaction in Libya came to light. Her response was, “What does it matter, it was so long ago.” That was her response to America being attacked and Americans being killed by muslim extremists in Libya. With the Clintons, depravity and lying are a family affair.

Two U.S. embassies were attacked in Africa, Mr. Ben Snowdon and Mr. David Johnson reported, “In 1998, the Clinton Administration demonstrated an atypical aggressive response towards terrorism after the assault on…U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, were bombed by terrorists, leaving 258 people dead and more than 5,000 injured (41).” One has the tendency to believe that disaster and death follow in the Clintons’ wake, much like the horror which seemingly follows each administration. Both of these attacks were attacks on sovereign U.S. soil and both occurred during the Clinton administration. Clinton’s response was, “The U.S. launched cruise missiles on Aug. 20, 1998, striking a terrorism training complex in Afghanistan and destroying a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility in Khartoum, Sudan, that reportedly produced nerve gas. Both targets were believed to have been financed by…Osama bin Laden.”

According to a report in the National Security Archive, declassified documents, “Suggest the strikes not only failed to hurt Osama bin Laden but ultimately may have brought al-Qaeda and the Taliban closer politically and ideologically (42).” I can’t understand why such an ineffective, expensive and pitiful little response was necessary. If military action was necessary, which I could have lived with, why not real targets? A so-called training facility and a drug factory (which was probably a milk factory) hardly seem like anything more than a waste of cruise missiles. But this is in keeping with Clinton’s façade.

Slick Willie wasn’t trying to send a real message to the terrorists, he was attempting to make American’s believe he wasn’t limp wristed. A 400 page Sandia National Laboratories report stated, “In retrospect, it seems as if threat assessment personnel in Washington did not take the warning signs as seriously as did the embassy personnel in Nairobi (43).” Once again we see how the Clinton administration fails to take threats to the security of the United States seriously. In fact, Clinton did more actual physical damage in Waco Texas than he did in Afghanistan or Sudan. The Clinton administration had no moral compass, what it had was a policy of distancing itself from threats to the U.S. while at the same time being the biggest threat to U.S. sovereignty that existed.

Let’s not forget about Clinton and the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996. President Clinton stated, “We will pursue this. Those who did this must not go unpunished.” According to Crime Library, FBI Director “Freeh expressed his frustrations and blamed President Clinton and his national security advisor Sandy Berger for having “no interest” in confronting the fact that Iran had blown up the towers.” FBI Director Freeh stated later in the article, “The Clinton administration feared that “Congress, and ordinary Americans, would find out that Iran murdered our soldiers,” which would imperil their diplomatic initiatives…President Clinton “deserted” the 19 victims and their families (44).” Here is another example of Clinton’s policy of doing nothing but paying lip service to America. Of course, I haven’t mentioned Osama bin Laden yet. In a 1997 interview with a London based Arabic-language newspaper, bin Laden stated, “We had thought that the Riyadh and Al Khobar blasts were a sufficient signal to sensible U.S. decision makers…but they did not understand the signal (45).” This is typical of the Clinton mentality. How many times did Osama bin Laden’s name need to come up with regard to Americans being killed? But each and every time, Clinton did basically nothing.

I cannot finish with Clinton without mentioning the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City in 1993. And of course, Osama bin Laden was behind the bombing, probably with the blessings of the administration. Larry Johnson a former CIA agent as well as having worked for the State Department stated, “Clinton’s weak response to the terrorist attacks that occurred during his presidency paved the way for the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.” The report goes on to state, “On Feb. 26, 1993, a car bomb was detonated at the World Trade Center in New York City…Osama bin Laden is suspected to have been behind the attack.”

Clinton’s reaction and statement to the American people was, “I would plead with the American people and the good people of New York to keep your courage up and go on about your lives. I would discourage the American people from overreacting to this.” Overreacting? How can anyone believe a president who would say such a thing is anything other than a traitor and a coward? This is typical behavior from the Clintons, and once again, nearly twenty years later, his wife had the same type of pathetic response to Benghazi and she distanced herself, just as her husband Slick Willie did in 1993.

Bill Clinton does have a long history with Osama bin Laden. Unfortunately, Osama bin Laden was always the one who was killing Americans and Slick Willie was always the one who was making excuses as to why he couldn’t or wouldn’t do anything. The exception to this, of course, was when Clinton was ordering the deaths of American citizens. Remember Waco? We have also seen how Clinton had no problem killing Christian Serbs to support muslims whose sole purpose was to kill Christians period. Clinton joyfully sent our troops to what was Yugoslavia, for no other purpose than to kill Christians. “Interestingly, Al-Jazeera celebrated the fifth anniversary of 9/11 by airing several al-Qaeda videos, one of which showed two of the 9/11 hijackers saying their actions were designed to avenge the suffering of Muslims in Bosnia and Chechnya. Nothing demonstrates the bankruptcy of the Clinton policy more than that (46).”

Bill Clinton, aka, Slick Willie, can only be summed up as a prevaricating dope who was impeached because he was a liar and an individual who obstructed justice. He was a murderer who ordered the deaths at Waco of approximately 80 Americans including at least 17 children and he was the inspiration of Timothy McVeigh. He was a friend of Islamo-fascist terrorists who included al Fatah, Osama bin Laden and the KLA; the killers of Serb Christians. Clinton was the spineless excuse-maker for all of his failed foreign policy blunders which included Mogadishu, Kenya, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Iran and I didn’t even go into his shameful Haiti legacy, and of course, his complete and utter failure with regard to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City and the obvious connection through all of his blunders which eventually led up to the complete destruction of the twin towers on 9/11 (which at least is the official U.S. government story).

I’ll never understand Clinton. He was probably the most educated and quite possibly the brightest man we’ve had in the Office of President in my lifetime, which isn’t saying much, but his actions as president were that of a downright imbecile. We should have distanced ourselves from Clinton, as he continually distanced himself from his own actions. He was a deceptive, spineless, pathetic example of a president whose actions were not only criminal, but corrupt as well. He was a disgrace to the nation while he was in office and he is a disgrace to the nation still.

The last thing I ever wanted was to be alive when the three most powerful people on the whole planet would be named Bush, Dick and Colon.
Kurt Vonnegut

George Walker Bush was the 43rd President from January 20, 2001 to January 20, 2009. He was supposedly elected to two terms in office. George W. Bush was a Texas Republican whose very close family ties with the bin Laden family has already been clearly stated.

The best place to start with Bush 43 is the USA PATRIOT Act which was signed into law by Bush on 26 October 2001, a whole 45 days after 9/11. The USA PATRIOT Act really only takes the Rights away from Americans, it doesn’t do much to combat any terrorists. I might have viewed it differently if all the provisions in the Act were aimed at the countries where the supposed hijackers were born, but they weren’t. This Act is overtly aimed at us, Americans, right here in the United States.

The unfortunate reality of the situation is this, it only took the U.S. government 45 days to swoop in and strip American citizens of their Liberty by enacting the USA PATRIOT Act. This “Act” is just that, an act, and it could easily label an American a terrorist for protecting himself, just as an officer of the law or military personnel could be labeled as such during the performance of their duties. Section 411, Subparagraph B, Clause (iv) states, “Engage in terrorist activity means, in an individual capacity or as a member of an organization—”(I) to commit or incite to commit, under circumstances indicating and intention to cause death or serious bodily injury, a terrorist activity.”” So, if an individual citizen or member of an organization like the police or military intend to kill or seriously harm a rapist, pedophile or armed robber in the commission of their depraved act, the individual, cop or soldier could be considered a terrorist according to the aforementioned U.S. government definition of terrorist activity. Beautiful!

When you consider none of the terrorists on 9/11 were officially Americans, but the majority of them were from Saudi Arabia, the fact that there is absolutely no reference to delineate and connect terrorist or terrorist activity to those who were in bed with the Bush family and to those with a close, long-standing relationship with his family is absurd. No new law is necessary to act against Americans who engage in criminal activities, as there are already a multitude of laws on the books and procedures in place to deal with that problem. The USA PATRIOT Act was designed, with speedy intent, to take away the Rights of Americans. Now an American cannot go to an airport and get on a plane without being probed and fondled by the TSA, of course if you were to walk up wearing a burqa, they would wave you right through. How does this help to prevent terrorism? I also have to wonder how there can be such a law as the USA PATRIOT Act, and not one U.S. politician has been captured, tried and convicted as a terrorist.

The self-serving politicians of the United States couldn’t come to any type of agreement unless the purpose was to benefit themselves or to screw the People of the United States. The USA PATRIOT Act does both. First it enacts a sweeping national law in which the politicians themselves are exempt and secondly it usurps the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 10th Amendments. The Right to free speech is non-existent in any airport or so-called government building, there is no more Right to unreasonable search and seizure as the government takes what they want, when they want, the People are forced to prove their own innocence or they are guilty, they are deprived of liberty and property without due process of law, there is no speedy trial and witnesses are non-existent and the accusations are simply ‘because we said so’, which isn’t a factual accusation and what about bail, or excessive fines imposed, or cruel and unusual punishment inflicted, or State sovereignty? The true purpose of the USA PATRIOT Act is intended to put another nail in the coffin of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights and turn a sovereign People into slaves of our feral federal government.

Another problem I have with the official story of the U.S. government is the pilots of major airlines in the United States are generally retired military pilots. Nobody on this planet can convince me that a former U.S. Navy or Air Force pilot wouldn’t have turned the jet upside-down as someone threatened him with a box cutter. Jumbo-jets can fly upside-down, maybe not for long, but long enough. Even if they just rolled over, the people threatening the plane would have had some serious injuries, probably broken necks. But the government will have everyone believe the unbelievable, hence the sheep have willingly allowed themselves to be led to the slaughter.

Next I would like to talk about the failed reasoning for the invasion of Iraq. While I personally believe Bush 41 should have ordered troops to finish Saddam and his henchmen while they were there the first time, I cannot figure out why we were there the second time. The U.S. government will have you believe it’s to protect the region and Americans, not to mention the threat of all those WMD. I don’t believe the reason was oil either, the reason has something to do with that area in general and the history behind the region. Personally, I believe our Satanist leaders were there looking for artifacts that most people wouldn’t touch. But our government has proved they are only interested in power at any cost. Just look around the U.S. and tell me the government doesn’t worship Nimrod. He [Mars] is right there at the entrance to the U.S. Capitol building. While the Queen of the Underworld, Persephone, or Semiramis his mother/wife, sits atop the dome looking down upon them. How about the Washington Monument? That giant phallic symbol is an idol of jealousy which is all about Nimrod. Feel free to think what you want, but I can’t believe these people are Christians.

There were no WMD in Iraq and they all knew it. Please don’t believe me, just go and purchase Charles Duelfers book, Hide and Seek: The Search for Truth in Iraq. Mr. Duelfer was the head of the U.S.-led ISG in Iraq after Dr. Kay resigned. Both stated there were no WMD in Iraq. An article on MSNBC stated, Mr. Duelfer who was the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq clearly stated that their search for WMD had failed and they found absolutely nothing of value. In other words, there was no just cause for the invasion, unless you want to call getting Saddam for his daddy – Bush 41 just cause.

If you remember Bush’s reasoning for the invasion, Iraq was expanding and improving their facilities for the production of biological weaponry and these WMD were a clear threat to the United States. Personally, this sounds like a president lying to the American public. Maybe he should have listened to Dr. Kay and Mr. Duelfer. Many good men got killed and many were wounded and maimed as a result of his vendetta with Saddam, who was their former CIA protégé. Naturally, this doesn’t touch on the fact that the U.S. has more of these types of weapons than any other nation. We even have the patent on Ebola according to some reports.

I should touch on the national debt; of course I will revisit this issue with Hussein Obama. The national debt of the United States increased $4.9 trillion during the eight year presidency of George W. Bush. This is a huge sum of taxpayer money which was misappropriated by the Bush regime. What I cannot figure out is why we didn’t take the Iraqi oil and force Afghanistan to pay for our troops to fight in their country. I guess the destabilization of Iraq and Afghanistan’s opium trade, which the U.S. is there to support, is payment enough for our leaders. Of course, we did the exact same thing in Vietnam and Central and South America.

From 2003-2009 the Iraq War cost at least $684.8 billion according to the Congressional Research Service (47). They also state in another PDF on Pakistan foreign assistance, which gives the amount of a transfer of $600 million right after Sept. 2001, and beginning in 2005 for a 5 year, $600 million per year amount totaling $3.6 billion, and beginning in 2007 a 5 year $750 million deal for the tribal areas (48). Aid for Afghanistan from 2001-2009 was nearly $38 billion, also according to Congressional Research Service (49). Of course this isn’t all the money that was spent in these three locations, but it gives an idea of what the Bush administration was doing with our taxpayer dollars, which means our money. Just the figures above total nearly $728 billion. It’s not hard to see how the deficit of the United States increased $4,900,000,000,000 in an eight year time frame.

I cannot see how our nation going to war in two locations without approval from Congress or the spending of our money, also without Congressional approval, has benefitted our nation. These are illegal acts and these are in violation of the Constitution of the United States. But to our leaders, the U.S. Constitution is something to be mocked and disregarded as just another piece of paper.

There can be no doubt that the military industrial complex thrived under both Bush administrations, just as it has under all administrations in my life. Our leaders on both sides of the aisle benefit greatly from mayhem around the world. Unfortunately, until the People of the United States and the people of the world understand (I should have said comprehend, they do appear to understand or stand under the U.S. government) that they are being used as pawns by people with no moral center, the problem will not be solved. It will get much worse, and may I say, to Biblical proportions.

The eight years of illegal immigration (or invasion) during the Bush administration is a good topic. Bush’s administration had a massive increase in illegal immigration and a massive decrease in enforcement of immigration laws. Illegal aliens arrested in cases involving the workplace fell nearly 85% from the last two years of the Clinton administration to the first two years of the Bush administration. By the end of Bushs’ first term in office, the estimate of illegal aliens in the U.S. was 10 to 20 million.

I’ve touched on this issue before, but I’ll briefly go at it again. The article by Dr. Corsi, Ph.D. starts out, “Despite having no authorization from Congress, the Bush administration has launched extensive working-group activity to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada (50).” So what exactly does that mean? What is a trilateral agreement with no Congressional oversight? It means, Bush with the blessings of Congressional inaction and ineptitude, Bush and his Illuminati cronies are secretly attempting to create a new nation; a North American Union. In the least, they are attempting to destroy the United States.

NAFTA negotiations began in 1986 during the Reagan-Bush administration and it was signed and came into force in 1994 during the Bill Clinton’s administration. According to Dr. Corsi, “The Security and Prosperity Partnership…signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.” Dr. Corsi further states, the agreement was, “Not submitted to Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office within the Department of Commerce.” Apparently there has been absolutely no Congressional oversight, there has been no bill from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and there is nothing about this that isn’t a secret. And the government wonders why we don’t trust them. Not that there is a connection, but a lot of ugly things seem to happen in Waco, Texas. If our so-called leaders are attempting to destroy the United States and form a North American Union, then these so-called leaders are guilty of treason. But I guess we’ll have to wait and see what happens. Nearly a decade later, the Obama administration happily continues the same policy and in fact has opened our borders unlike any other administration we have had in the past. This is just another example of one administration following the misguided policies of the previous administration.

Another Bush topic is Tora Bora. As we all know Tora Bora was a CIA financed complex built in the White Mountains barely 20 miles from the Pakistan border. The CIA knew every trail which led through the area. During the early 1980s (Reagan/Bush administration), at least $3 billion was used to finance and arm the Mujahideen to fight the Soviets. Osama bin Laden actually had the equipment flown into the area from his father’s construction company, the Saudi Binladen Group.

While the Bush administration did order the bombardment of the area in December of 2001, what strikes me as most curious is the fact that the U.S. government actually knew a great deal about Tora Bora. After all, the CIA financed the entire operation and was more than ‘just familiar’ with the area. If you consider these facts, why weren’t the U.S. troops given the information so they could go into each and every cave after the bombardment took place? Perhaps there were some changes made to the structure, but the general design was no different. Apparently, the U.S. government and military leaders thought bombing the area while three dozen U.S. Special Forces troops watched was a good policy. Those were the only troops our leaders committed to Tora Bora and that was just for show. And it wasn’t a very good show at that. I would call it an embarrassment, but it’s business as usual for the government.

If at least one of the objectives of the Afghanistan War was to kill Osama bin Laden, wouldn’t it have made more sense to pass on the intelligence from the CIA to maybe the Marine Corps or the Army and have an entire division go after bin Laden at Tora Bora? But it would seem as though the true purpose wasn’t to actually kill bin Laden or the Bush administration would have made Tora Bora a much higher priority.

If you remember, not long before the Tora Bora campaign Bush 43 did make certain the bin Laden family in the United States was able to board an airplane and fly out of the United States safely while each and every American within the U.S. was not allowed to fly at all. There certainly is a very strange symbiosis between the Bush family and the bin Laden family that makes me uncomfortable.

To this day, the U.S. government refuses to allow 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission report to be declassified. Why? Perhaps it would show the People of the United States just exactly what the leadership of the U.S. knew before and after the 9/11 attacks. Personally, I think the United States government orchestrated the entire event along with some of their middle eastern friends. People call them al Qaeda or the Taliban or ISIS, but they are the same organization and that organization is funded by the United States.

I’m really not sure I need to waste any more time with President Bush. As we have seen, the Bush family has a very close and inappropriate relationship with the bin Laden family. George W. Bush personally enabled the bin Laden family to fly out of the United States when all flights except military were grounded after 9/11. Why would he have done that? Was this to appease the terrorist friends of Bush’s family? I still cannot understand why they weren’t all hung from newly erected gallows outside the White House. There is the USA PATRIOT Act, which was done with such haste (that is if it wasn’t already drawn up before hand), it really only serves to strip away the Rights of U.S. citizens. Bush absolutely lied about the reasoning for invading Iraq; there were no WMD in Iraq and he knew this, but he invaded anyway. Bush also increased our national public debt by $4.9 trillion in eight years, but seemed to accomplish nothing of any real value that couldn’t have been accomplished much easier and at a much lower cost. Bush also failed to enforce existing immigration laws and refused to defend our southern border with Mexico, he set up secret trilateral agreements with Canada and Mexico without Congressional oversight or without any bill from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Once again furthering his father’s NAFTA agenda just as he furthered his father’s agenda with regard to the bin Laden family. And as we have just seen Bush’s utter failure at Tora Bora, unless what happened was just a show for the American people and not a campaign really designed to kill Osama bin Laden. Then there are the 28 pages of classified information he and the U.S. government believes the American People are too stupid to understand, but they claim it’s national security. Bull.

Either way, it would appear Bush 43 was very successful at what he did, which in my opinion was to further the destruction of the United States, even though I consider his legacy to be nothing more than a complete failure. Bush was an arrogant, corrupt and deceptive president whose disdain for the American People reeks so bad, his malfeasance can easily be smelled from a distance. Bush should be considered stupid and his behavior should be considered criminal, which is exactly what most of this world thinks.

When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I’m beginning to believe it.
Clarence Darrow

And now to our lusterless Barack Hussein Obama, aka, Barry Soetoro, the 44th President from January 20, 2009 to the present. I guess he was elected to two terms, because he still occupies the White House, at least while he’s not out vacationing and playing golf. Hussein Obama is a Kenyan born, Illinois Democrat who by far is the worst president in the history of the United States of America. Personally, I prefer to just think of Obama as the Lord of the Flies.

I say Kenyan born for a few of reasons. One reason is because his wife, Michelle (Michael) Obama was speaking about her husband and said he “visited his home country in Kenya (51).” There is very little chance a man’s wife doesn’t know where his home country is, in this case Michelle Obama knows exactly where her husband’s home country is, and she stated it correctly, Kenya.

The second reason I say Obama is a Kenyan, is his birth certificate from the Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. According to a report, “California attorney Orly Taitz…has released a copy of what purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth and has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court for its authentication.” The report continues, “The document lists Obama’s parents as Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya (52).”

Now I would consider both of these items to be extremely compelling. Obama’s wife says his home country is Kenya, and now a birth certificate from Kenya surfaces. What is most interesting is that it took nearly three (3) years for Obama to show his so-called birth certificate from Hawaii to the American People. Why the big deal? But I should say this, in 1961 in the United States, Obama’s father’s race wouldn’t have been listed as African, it would have been listed as Negro. That is a fact.

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution makes Obama ineligible to even be President of the United States. Opponents of the idea that Obama is a foreigner, stated in claim, “The Feb. 17, 1964, date for the document, explaining that the “republic” of Kenya wasn’t assembled until December of that year. – Media Matters wrote, “Sorry, WorldNetDaily: Kenya wasn’t a republic until Dec. 1964.””

However, according to a number of different sources, that isn’t actually the entire truth, just as it never is. According to WND, “At Ameriborn Constitution News, the researcher noted that the independence process for the nation actually started taking place as early as 1957, when there were the first direct elections for Africans to the Legislative Council.” The People Daily News Agency states, “Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki gives a speech during a celebration to mark the country’s 42nd independence anniversary in Nairobi, capital of Kenya Dec. 12, 2005. The country gained independence from Britain on Dec. 12, 1963.” According to BBC News Africa, “1963 – Kenya gains independence, with Kenyatta as Prime Minister. 1964 – Republic of Kenya formed. Kenyatta becomes president and Odinga vice-president (53).” While I could easily go on about the date, I think it’s pretty clear that any official paperwork for and from the Republic of Kenya would be dated back at least as far as 1963 (54).

Then there is Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation into what he calls “a forged, fraudulent government document (55),” and Mara Zebest who is an expert on the subject of tech stated Obama’s birth certificate “was born in cyberspace (56).” But supporters of Obama simply don’t seem to care if they are lied to or not. Many people in the United States simply cannot fathom a world without one side of the aisle or the other. This is an unfortunate fact, especially when you consider both sides are comprised of anti-Americans.

We can’t talk about Hussein Obama without talking about Bill Ayers. As reported by David Horowitz in a piece entitled “Allies in War,” Mr. Horowitz states, “On the morning of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon…I opened its pages…showing a middle-aged couple holding hands and affecting a defiant look at the camera. The article was headlined…”No Regrets For A Love Of Explosives (57).”” Of course, the photograph was of Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, both Ayers and Dohrn were members of the Weathermen. In other words, they were terrorists. Aside from being terrorists, both Ayers and Dohrn were and are partisans of Charles Manson, “Dig it. First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, they even shoved a fork into the victim’s stomach! Wild!” That was a statement from Dohrn when she was referring to the Manson family murders of Sharon Tate and her guests.

All that having been said, Hussein Obama and Bill Ayers seem to have some common connections. According to the Washington Post, both “were members of the board of…the Woods Fund of Chicago, between 1999 and 2002…Ayers contributed $200 to Obama’s re-election fund to the Illinois State Senate in April 2001…[and] they lived within a few blocks of each other…and moved in the same liberal-progressive circles (58).” While this could simply be a random connection between the two, I have to say I don’t believe a U.S. Senator or a U.S. President for that matter, should allow themselves to be associated with terrorists in any way, shape or form. In the very least, this is an example of Obama’s poor judgment, at most, it is a disgraceful example of the type of individual Obama really is. But as we have previously seen with the Bush and bin Laden families, the Clinton’s and Carter with Arafat, this happens far too often within our U.S. government.

According to The Obama File, “In 1989, Obama was a summer intern at Michelle Obama’s law firm. One of Michelle’s co-workers was Bernardine Dohrn (59).” That law firm was Sidley & Austin. The report goes on to tell a, “Couple hosted a “meet and greet” for Obama at Ayers house in Hyde Park…where Obama now lives as a neighbor of Louis Farrakhan.” It looks like they are not such strange bedfellows as they would have us believe.

Later, in 1995, “Obama was the first Chairman of the Board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge,” Bill Ayers was the co-founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. And in 1997, “Ayers and Obama participated in a panel at the University of Chicago.” Lastly, according to the article, “Ayers, Dohrn and Obama…participated together at a conference entitled “Intellectuals: Who needs them?”” Now what connections between Bill Ayers the terrorist and Hussein Obama do we have? We have the Woods Fund of Chicago, Ayers contribution to Obama’s re-election campaign for the Illinois State Senate, the close proximity with which they both lived, the liberal-progressive circles with which they both travelled, Obama’s working relationship at Sidley & Austin where Dohrn was a co-worker of Michelle Obama, the meet and greet at Ayers house, Obama’s chairmanship at Challenge where Ayers was a co-founder and their participation in the panel at the University of Chicago.

It apparently is not a coincidence that Ayers and Obama crossed paths. These two have had a longstanding relationship that dates back to at least 1989. That’s nearly a quarter-century.

I’m not really certain there is a point to pointing out the multitudes of lies that have come out of Hussein Obama’s mouth, but I will point out at least a few of them. ABC news reported, “Sen. Barack Obama’s pastor says blacks should not sing “God Bless America” but “God damn America (60).” Those were the words from Jeremiah Wright, the pastor at Obama’s church, Trinity United Church of Christ. According to the article, Wright said “The United States brought on the 9/11 attacks with its own “terrorism.”” Naturally, then Senator Obama stated, “I don’t think my church is actually particularly controversial.” That sounds like a very controversial statement to me. If you think about the statement, the person who said it and the people who listened, then you should understand what they want.

While you could easily say we have a misguided foreign policy agenda which causes us endless problems and it does, the bigger truth is, every president in my lifetime has acted like a terrorist. It’s possible and even more probable that the U.S. government had something to do with 9/11, but nobody will ever know that truth. But Hussein Obama is a muslim or at least a muslim sympathizer and he aligns himself with radicals and radicalism who believe America should be damned, not it’s leadership. The leadership of the U.S. and the rest of the world, including the Vatican and Islam are the problem and this isn’t going to be solved anytime soon. The biggest problem is these people all work together for a common and unrighteous goal. Christians and muslims may not like to hear this any more than Americans and others around the world, but all of our leaders are working together as one and they have been for some time now. I seriously doubt this will end anytime soon. We also shouldn’t forget the U.S. government seeks submission, just like Islam, which is what Islam means – submission.

Even the founding fathers of this nation knew the Islamists wanted to kill anyone who didn’t conform to their belief system. In 1786, Adams and Jefferson met with Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the Dey of Algiers who stated, “Islam was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations that should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners (61).” This same belief is furthered by the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood, “Allah is our objective; the Prophet is our leader; the Quran is our law; Jihad is our way; dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope (62).” Obama and any other so-called leader in the U.S. who tells you that isn’t what Islam is about, obviously has a hidden agenda and objective. This is what the muslim leadership says; we did not put these words into their mouths.

But like I said, on the flip side of the coin, our leadership does the same thing. Since the Johnson administration, our military has operated in at least sixty-six nations. That’s more than one per year. So I would suggest the leadership of this world uses the same tactics, no matter who they are, they just put a different label on it and then foist it upon us while they stir the pot and watch us cook.

Let’s talk about Gitmo for a moment. On January 22, 2009, two days after Obama was sworn into office, “President Obama ordered the controversial prison camp at Guantanamo Bay closed within a year (63).” Today’s date is August 21, 2012 and according to a August 17, 2012 story on AP, “A federal judge voiced skepticism Friday about new government restrictions on lawyers’ access to detainees at Guantanamo Bay (64).” I cannot believe (or shouldn’t believe) a federal judge would be skeptical about a new government restriction regarding a detainees bid to challenge their confinement with regard to the attorney’s access to their clients at Gitmo, if Gitmo were indeed closed. In fact it sounds like the prison at Guantanamo Bay Cuba is still up and running strong! It’s now almost 2015 and Gitmo is still in operation. I guess Obama figured if he couldn’t get them all transferred to Illinois to become his constituents, then he might as well leave them in Cuba where they belong. This is an obvious example of an Obama lie. But in 2016, Obama has decreed that the prisoners will be sent to the U.S., at least the ones they haven’t freed already.

The prison at Guantanamo Bay suits Obama or he would have shut it down by now. The undeniable fact is that keeping Gitmo open in some way benefits Obama. He only thought it was a bad idea when Bush was in office. Apparently, this was just another Obama lie.

Libya is a subject Obama would have you believe is one he can put in the win column. I disagree with that idea. The United States didn’t have any business bombing Libya. The only thing it did was get rid of a dictator so he could be replaced with another, this time, one who will make Libya an Islamic republic complete with sharia law. Of course, it’s now 2016 and Obama is bombing Libya again, because what these idiots created has gotten too far out of control and is harming their objectives.

Qaddafi was undoubtedly a loser, but he was a loser who wasn’t making problems anymore. Now Libya is a lawless nation of fiefdoms at best. As of the 20th of January, 2012, Libya still has a massive stockpile of mustard gas. When you stop to consider many of the fighters who called themselves rebels had just left places like Iraq, where they were fighting U.S. forces, it’s not hard to make the connection that they were al Qaeda and the Taliban. But as we now know they are Isis. This was the plan of the U.S. State Department and the White House.

According to UPI, “The country still has to destroy 11.25 tons of mustard gas (65).” In other words, there are approximately 22,500 lbs of this stuff in Libya and as you have already guessed, “A team of Americans and Libyans (66)” are guarding the stockpile. What is interesting is, didn’t Obama say there would be no American boots on the ground in Libya? Aside from the obvious spotters for the bombing, now Al Arabiya states there were others there as well. I only point this out, because it is another one of Obama’s lies.

Since I have already made the connection between Bill Ayers and Obama, I don’t really see any point in going over it again. But I will say this, Obama did claim Ayers was, “A guy who lives in my neighborhood…He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis (67).” This was an obvious lie. Obama and Ayers had a relationship that has lasted nearly 25 years. It isn’t possible to have so many connections to someone and simply refer to them casually as a guy in the neighborhood.

Unfortunately, Obama is just a cheap copy of a copy. Each and every U.S. President since Kennedy was assassinated has been a mirror image of the one who came before him. The biggest problem with this is, that they seem to be getting progressively worse each time. That is one thing Obama didn’t lie about, his being progressive and by that I do mean progressively worse.

Why does Obama continually apologize for America? According to CNS News as well as Newsmax, Obama has apologized, “For America’s “arrogance” regarding countries Americans died to help free; To detainee terrorists interrogated by the CIA; For the accidental burning of the Korans; To Obamacare activist Sandra Fluke (68).” The article also stated the apologies Obama didn’t make, “To Catholics forced by the government to violate their faith; To the family of border patrol agent Brian Terry murdered by Operation Fast and Furious guns; To families of American soldiers killed after Obama said he calmed things down in Afghanistan; To Israel, for saying it should return to its 1967 borders which would’ve subjected it to attacks; To American taxpayers forced to violate their religious beliefs and pay for abortion; For attending radical Rev. Wright’s church for years.” This all comes from a speech from Rep. Louis Gohmert of Texas in the House of Representatives.

I would like to add, Obama doesn’t apologize for all of his cowardly drone strikes which murder families, his inaction with regard to Christians being slaughtered, his complete and utter disdain for the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, his hatred of the American People and his blatantly opulent lifestyle as the Vacationer in Chief at the U.S. taxpayer’s expense. All are things which he should be ashamed of, but politicians in the U.S. are the most shameless bunch of self-centered narcissists found on the planet.

So what do we have? We have three apologies to muslims and one to his own activist, but we have none to Americans or their families for his governmental blunders (Fast & Furious) or to our closest ally in the Middle East, Israel. It is one thing to apologize for something that we really screw-up, but it’s another thing to continually apologize for America like we’re some sort of idiots, which isn’t the case. If anything, the idiots are in the U.S. government; Obama should just start apologizing for himself. This is not humility on Obama’s part, it’s absolute weakness.

Another thing Obama should remember is, when he apologizes, in effect he is apologizing for the People of this country. Personally, I don’t remember asking him to do that and I know a great deal of other Americans feel the same way. This is another example of a president thinking he is more than just a servant to the People. Both Obama and his wife have serious issues with the United States, which the liberal media is more than willing to continually gloss over.

Maybe we should spend a moment talking about the national debt under Obama (69). While the national debt increased $4.9 trillion during eight years of Bush, in just less than four years of Obama the national debt has increased $5.4 trillion. In an article from the Washington Times on October 9, 2013 (today is August 22, 2014) the article states, “When Mr. Obama became president in January 2009, the total federal debt stood at $10.6 trillion. This week it hit $16.7 trillion – an increase of 57 percent. In the same time frame under President George W. Bush, total federal debt rose 38 percent. Under President Clinton, it rose 32 percent (70).”

Obama stated, “Raising the limit won’t add a dime,” but the article states, “The government has already borrowed the equivalent of more than 60 trillion dimes since he took office.” While this is an obvious lie, the point is the debt, not the lie.

Of course, Obama can only blame this on Bush. While Bush did increase the debt dramatically, Obama has increased the debt astronomically. Oddly enough, Obama has maintained most of what Bush was doing, even though he stated he was going to do away with what he considered Bush’s failures when he got into office. What we have seen is the failure of Obama himself. He has accomplished nothing, but he has taken credit for things he had nothing to do with at all. But one thing we know he has done is increased the national debt more than any other president in the history of the United States and in a much shorter period of time.

I simply cannot finish with Hussein Obama until I talk about how he and his administration leak information and his bragging about how he killed Osama bin Laden. For starters, Obama didn’t go and kill anyone, he doesn’t have the backbone for that. He gave the orders to men who have trained very hard for years to be able to accomplish such missions. But Obama? He never pulled the trigger and he wasn’t even there. His boasting may make it seem like he’s a big hero to some people out there, but this nonsense only tends to put men in harm’s way who fight for the United States. These are the same people he considers to be possible enemy combatants when they come back home from their duty to the country.

According to a report from Reuters, “A group of former U.S. intelligence and Special Forces operatives…scolds President Barack Obama for taking credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden and argues that high-level leaks are endangering American lives.” The report further states, “Mr. President, you did not kill Osama bin Laden, America did. The work that the American military has done killed Osama bin Laden. You did not (71).” The report stated the man who said that was Ben Smith, a U.S. Navy SEAL.

I don’t know about you, but personally, I believe the SEAL. Mr. Smith goes on to say, “As a citizen, it is my civic duty to tell the president to stop leaking information to the enemy…It will get Americans killed.” You can believe whoever you wish, President Hussein Obama or a U.S. Navy SEAL, the choice is yours. However, Mr. Smith is obviously a selfless man amongst other selfless men whose service to the nation can only be described as more than exemplary. His humility in stating that America killed bin Laden is a credit to the finest warriors the world will ever know. I believe Obama is nothing more than a blowhard, a fraud and a liar.

Another example as noted by The Lonely Conservative is then Sen. Obama originally stated in 2008 that Bush’s surge in Iraq wouldn’t work but it would create sectarian violence, “Tonight we heard President Bush say that the surge in Iraq is working, when we know that’s just not true (72).” Of course, the surge was working and it was what was probably needed from the beginning, enough troops to pound the enemy. That being said, Obama seems to take all the credit for any gains in Iraq, when it should have gone to the military. But Obama’s hasty withdrawal has led to sectarian violence. In fact, Iraq is like a ticking time bomb that is ready to explode, I guess that is why in August 2014 Obama decided to start bombing Iraq again.

Iran has been able to influence the crazies who are there without fear of reprisal, just as we have been there influencing the crazies. Both the Bush and the Obama administrations funded them in Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Turkey, so now we have a problem, just under another name. Today they call themselves IS or Daesh. They were ISIL (trained by Americans in Jordan), ISIS (America certainly armed them in Libya), al Qaeda (trained by Americans in Afghanistan). A very large part of what is happening is a result of the failure of the Legislative and Executive branches of government and the State Department’s constant meddling in foreign nations.

Certainly, Obama has done nothing other than order the deaths of people around the world. He has increased the number of countries the U.S. is operating in with regard to military operations. I can only imagine what his plan is, but I seriously doubt it will benefit the United States. Of course, he feels the need to also bomb Syria now. But unlike Libya’s Qaddafi, Assad is not pushing for the gold and silver Dinar, but we should all take note of the fact that Syria does not have a Rothschild Central Bank. We must not have an embassy to protect in Syria anymore or Obama would use that as an excuse to bomb them, which is exactly what his reasoning in part is in Iraq and as always he’s willing to toss in the slaughter of the religious minority for good measure. Well that has meant nothing in how many years in Syria, and protecting a U.S. Embassy is always a good thing as long as it isn’t in Libya, but “what does it matter, that was so long ago…,” as eloquently stated by then U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

One curious bit of information is, since Obama’s inauguration, a report dated April 4, 2011 states, “Combat-related deaths that occurred since the Afghanistan war began in October 2001, about 64 percent happened in the two years since Obama took office (73).” Now that’s what I call leadership. I can see why Obama continues to decimate the ranks of the military, he has to have someone to blame for his failures. The only thing Obama is capable of other than bypassing Congress is the leaking of information and bragging about exploits he didn’t do. Plus lying about what is really happening as related to the surge in Iraq and the result of a hasty withdrawal is nothing but reckless.

But the mess these morons have created cannot be cleaned up. The mess was designed to get messier, but that’s the beauty of the War on Terror, it can’t end. I’m not suggesting there aren’t those who need to be stopped, but we should at least stop funding them before we send our military to try to stop them. Perhaps the military industrial complex made up of the Halliburtons and the KBRs of the world wouldn’t like that, which is why we are funding them and bombing them at the same time. All we have is a different administration with the same tactics.

There is no reason to continue with Hussein Obama. He has lied about where he was born, which was Kenya as shown on his Kenyan birth certificate and in his wife’s words. His Hawaii birth certificate, which is a crime because it’s a forgery. Arizona’s Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has investigated that document and states it is a forgery and experts state it was manufactured in cyberspace. Obama has lied about his close relationship with terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and he has had a relationship with them for nearly 25 years. Another lie is Obama’s close association with the radical Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Wright is a man who hates the United States probably as much as Ayers and Dohrn and blames Americans for all the terrorism in the world, when the truth is both the leadership of the U.S. government as well as radical Islam promotes terrorism against everyone who isn’t muslim. Which really makes Obama a muslim sympathizer, but I believe he is a radical muslim from the start. It’s funny that the muslims hate Obama, I guess they are capable of seeing exactly what he is, while Americans sit on their fat asses and support him. Obama lied again when he stated he was going to shut down the prison at Guantanamo Bay Cuba, but it is still operational and he seems to be just fine with the prison still being open now that he’s in office.

Libya is another one of Obama’s fiascos. He may have stopped Qaddafi from getting the gold and silver Dinar out there for use as a replacement to the American petrodollar, but he has failed even in that. Russia and China along with the other BRICS aren’t going to continue to use the US dollar for trading oil and I wish them well in their endeavor if it helps us get rid of the Federal Reserve Bank. However, the BRICS replacement won’t be any different. But the fault lies with Congress who refuses to follow Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution; To coin Money, to regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.

The only thing Obama was able to accomplish was opening the door for another Islamic State ruled by sharia law. Plus his lies about no American boots on the ground in Libya, when we know there were spotters for the bombing raids as well as men guarding mustard gas stockpiles. He was successful in arming ISIS to the teeth which is now one of his problems. In true form, he continues to blame Bush for everything that happens during his administration, when they both share the blame.

Then of course we have Obama the Apologist, embarrassing himself and the United States whenever he apologizes for America to the people of the world, but he refuses to take responsibility for the death of agent Brian Terry or his Fast and Furious gun smuggling debacle.

Obama has increased the national debt faster than any president in the history of the United States, $5,400,000,000,000 and he still isn’t done with the 4 year term he was illegally elected to serve. But that was 2012, the figures are much higher today, our Federal debt as of September 19, 2014 is over $18,000,000,000,000 and at the beginning of 2016 it’s over $19,000,000,000,000.

Obama has also taken intelligence leaks to a new low, which endanger U.S. troops, not to mention his outlandish claims that he killed Osama bin Laden. Obama even lied about the surge that Bush did in Iraq and stated it wasn’t working, when in fact, it was working. But Obama hastily pulled out of Iraq and now Iraq is just a powder-keg ready to explode rife with Iranian influence, Isis fighters and God knows what else. And lastly, at least 64% of combat-related deaths in the entire Afghanistan War can be attributed to the incompetence of Obama and his administration, and that figure is from 2011.

What else can possibly be said about this man? He is by far the worst thing to ever happen to the United States of America and he will continue to happily destroy us if he is given the chance. Obama is the most self-serving example of a president the nation has ever had. His actions are that of a spineless incompetent whose lust for evil can only be described as cowardly and pathetic. This man is the definition of a corrupt politician whose criminal behavior plunges the definition of disgraceful to new depths with each waking moment. He is an embarrassment to himself and to the nation. The word incompetence doesn’t even come close to defining his acts of utter stupidity and shame which have violated the public trust, and are only surpassed by his complete lack of moral fiber. Obama is a hypocrite and a prevaricator whose façade is a mere illusion, when in reality he is a nightmare.

Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re so ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.
Ronald Reagan

What does all of this say about our elected leaders, in this case the presidents of the United States, over the last fifty years? I can’t help but think that each and every president has forgotten they are merely servants of the People of this great nation. I also can’t help but think, We the People have allowed the mis-managers of governance to continue on their path of malfeasance and corruption. If we don’t force our so-called leaders to obey the supreme Law of the Land; the U.S. Constitution as well as the laws of the various States, then how can we actually expect such a self-serving bunch of miscreants to obey the law?

As eloquently stated by Patrick Henry, “The Constitution is an instrument for the people to restrain government.” Until the sovereign People of this great nation are willing to step forward and demand lawful and moral actions from our president or any other elected leader, we will continue on the downward spiral which we are currently experiencing. Sadly, I don’t think that will happen. Much of the time, our president and our government officials behave in a malevolent fashion and the side they keep choosing is the wrong one. The actions of our presidents and the U.S. government have become what seem to be rule by a gang of thugs where the police state exists to control the masses where everyone is their prey.

The unfortunate reality is, when the U.S. falls due to its failed monetary policy and excessive debt, Executive or State Department fatwas or God’s wrath, there will be a sucking sound so great it will lead the world straight to hell. But that appears to be the current policy of the U.S., so to think it’s not part of their end-game is ridiculous.

At the end of the day, we should all ask ourselves some tough questions. Who are the real fools? Are the fools our so-called elected leaders or are we the fools for continuing to vote them into office ad nauseam? Or is the answer both. I’m not certain it is actually possible to conclude this chapter, how does one conclude something which has been ongoing for at least the last fifty years, and appears to have no end in sight? I would argue the answer is in the U.S. Constitution and in deposing our current gang of thieves which plague both sides of the aisle. We need to make certain that those who wish to serve the People, are held accountable for their actions, as We the People are not the servants; we are the Masters.

I would also like to note a 12-year-old girl named BridgeAnne d’Avignon claims all presidents are related with the exception of one, Van Buren (and there is some debate to this, some claim Van Buren was related to Teddy Roosevelt) (74). Apparently, all are related to King John of England. If this is true, we should be able to tell who the next U.S. president will be; another puppet of the Illuminati, because free elections in the U.S. don’t exist. The so-called illuminated ones give you two choices, bad and worse, then you vote. That’s the sham the American People believe in nowadays. They are quick to point fingers at the Ukraine or any other nation, but they refuse to accept what’s right in front of their own faces.

If you remember, the State of Florida has made this mistake at least twice, but Ohio and others are just as guilty. Once with Bush v. Gore and once with Obama v. Romney (and probably with McCain too). What a bunch of pathetic tools. And to think the American People continue to vociferously and vehemently support one side or the other is not only preposterous, but surreal and mind-boggling.

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out — because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out — because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out — because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.
Rev. Martin Niemoeller


(1) Spartacus Educational; Suite 8F Group, John Simkin. September 1997
(2) The George Washington University; Unclassified Document: Joint Chiefs of Staff, Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense: Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba (TS), Operation Northwoods. March 13, 1962
(3) LBJ Library; National Security Action Memorandum, NSAM 273: South Vietnam, White House. November 26, 1963
(4) Marquette University; Vietnam War: The Documents-14; National Security Action Memorandum 263, John McAdams. October 5, 1963
(5) YouTube; Prison Planet TV: Infowars, E. Howard Hunt Outs Lyndon Johnson in JFK Assassination Plot, posted by Charles Ewing Smith. October 25, 2013

(6) YouTube; RFK to Johnson Why Did You Kill My Brother? Posted by Revelations in America. December 26, 2008

(7) The Estes Documents; Glen Sample.
(8) Slate; The Honest Graft of Lady Bird Johnson: How she and Lyndon came by their millions, Jack Shafer. July 16, 2007
(9); Intelligence-The Huston Plan.
(10) Wikipedia; Watergate Burglaries.
(11) Wikipedia; Watergate Scandal.
(12) The Washington Post; The Watergate Story, Timeline.
(13) BBC News Magazine; The Lyndon Johnson tapes: Richard Nixon’s ‘treason’, David Taylor. 22 March 2013
(14) The New York Times; The CIA Drug Connection Is as Old as the Agency, Larry Collins. December 3, 1993
(15) History; This Day in History, American Ship Mayaguez Seized. May 12, 1975
(16) U.S. News, A World Report; Gerald Ford v. Jimmy Carter: “There is No Soviet Domination of Eastern Europe,” Elisabeth Goodridge. January 17, 2008
(17) The Masonic Trowel; U.S. Masonic Presidents, by Grand Lodge of Texas.
(18) EIR News Service Inc.; Carter on the PLO. September 29, 1977
(19) United States History; Iran Hostage Crisis.
(20) U.S. NRC-United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; Backgrounder on the Three Mile Island Accident.
(21) The Institute for Southern Studies; Investigation: Revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety, Sue Sturgis. April 2, 2009
(22) Three Mile Island Alert; Three Mile Island: The People’s Testament, Aileen Mioko Smith. 1989
(23) PDF Search Books; Three Mile island.
(24); President Jimmy Carter/Admiral Hyman Rickover/3 Mile Island Cover-Up, Bill Smirnow.
(25) History Commons; Iran-Contra and Arms-for-Hostages Scandals, Creative Commons, project managed by mtuck.
(26) Consortiumblog; The Curious Bush/Bin Laden Symbiosis, Robert Parry. May 7, 2011
(27) PBS; American Experience, The Iran-Contra Affair.
(28) Wikipedia; United States support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war.
(29) Ottomans and Zionists; Is Arming Rebels A Good Idea? Michael Koplow. July 24, 2012
(30) UCADIA; Legal Terms of Control/Power:S.
(31) Miller Center-University of Virginia; George H. W. Bush: Domestic Affairs, Stephen Knott.
(32) Inquirer Washington Bureau; Nailing Down The S&L Bill Lobbyist Press On Final Details, Robert A. Rankin. July 9, 1989
(33) Wikipedia; Halliburton 1990s.
(34) CNN Politics; A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga.
(35) The Free Dictionary by Farlex; Branch Davidian Raid.
(36) PBS FRONTLINE; Waco: The Inside Story, Frequently Asked Questions About Waco.
(37) Canada Free Press; Dick Morris: Bill Clinton Personally Orchestrated the 1993 Waco, Texas Tragedy, Fred Dardick. April 20, 2010
(38); Clinton Plays The Oklahoma City Card, Dick Morris and Eileen McGann. April 20, 2010


(39) Accuracy in Media; Clinton’s Kosovo Whopper, Cliff Kincaid. September 27, 2006
(40) The Guardian; Mogadishu outrage puts Clinton in firing line, Simon Tisdall. October 5, 1993
(41) Infoplease; Primer on the Embassy Bombings and the U.S. Strikes on Sudan and Afghanistan, Ben Snowdon and David Johnson.
(42) The National Security Archive, The George Washington University; 1998 Missile Strikes on bin Laden May Have Backfired, Extensive Report on al-Qaeda Released by U.S. Dept of Energy-Taliban Told U.S. They Wanted to Bomb Washington. The National Security Archive: August 20, 2008
(43) Sandia National Laboratories; Osama bin Laden: A Case Study – Part I: Summary and Analysis. The George Washington University. The National Security Archive:
(44) Internet Archive Wayback Machine: Crime Library; The Bombing of Khobar Towers, Anthony Bruno.
(45); Clinton Paid ‘Lip Service’ to Terror Attacks, Expert Charges, Matt Pyeatt. July 7, 2008
(46) See chapter 6 reference #39.
(47) Congressional Research Service; The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and other Global War on Terror Operations since 9/11, Amy Belasco: Specialist in U.S. Defense Policy and Budget. March 29, 2011
(48) Congressional Research Service; Pakistan: U.S. Foreign Assistance, Susan B. Epstein: Specialist in Foreign Policy and K. Alan Kronstadt: Specialist in South Asian Affairs. July 1, 2013
(49) Congressional Research Service; Afghanistan: U.S. Foreign Assistance, Curt Tarnoff: Specialist in Foreign Affairs. July 8, 2009
(50) WND; The New World Disorder: Bush Sneaking North American Super-State Without Oversight, Jerome R. Corsi Ph.D. 13 June 2006.
(51) YouTube; Michelle Obama admits the President’s home country is Kenya, posted by 21st Century Awakening. October 20, 2011

(52) WND; Is This Really Smoking Gun of Obama’s Kenyan Birth? WorldNetDaily Exclusive. August 2, 2009
(53) People Daily News Agency: People’s Daily Online,; Kenya celebrates 42nd anniversary of national independence. December 13, 2005
(54) BBC News Africa; Kenya profile. Article updated, June 16, 2014
(55) New American; Sheriff Arpaio: “Close” to Finding Obama’s Birth Certificate Forger, Selwyn Duke. June 26, 2014
(56) American Thinker; New Obama Birth Certificate Forgery Proof in the Layers, Mara Zebest. July 18, 2012
(57) Front Page Magazine; Allies in War, David Horowitz. September 17, 2001
(58) The Washington Post; Obama’s ‘Weatherman’ Connection, Michael Dobbs. February 19, 2008
(59) Soda Head; More on The Obama File; Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn (A revisit on BO that alot of ppl would like swept under the rug). July 14, 2010
(60) ABC News; Obama’s Pastor: God Damn America, US to Blame for 9/11, Brian Ross. May 7, 2008
(61) Free Republic; What Thomas Jefferson learned from the Muslim book of jihad, Ted Sampley. January 5, 2007
(62) The Wall Street Journal; ‘The Quran Is Our Law; Jihad Is Our Way’, Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Updated February 18, 2011
(63) Council On Foreign Relations; Should Guantanamo Bay Be Closed? John B. Bellinger III, Shayana Kadidal, Clifford D. May, William Yeomans. January 21, 2010
(64) AP: Associated Press; Judge Skeptical of New Policy on Gitmo Access, Frederic J. Frommer. August 17, 2012
(65) UPI: United Press International; Mustard gas remains undestroyed in Libya. January 20, 2012
(66) Al Arabiya News; Secret teams guarded Qaddafi mustard gas in war, AFP. November 1, 2011
(67) Fox News; Barack Obama’s Pattern of False Statements on Bill Ayers, John Lott. October 13, 2008,2933,437201,00.html
(68); Rep. Gohmert Uses Visual Aid To Chart ‘Apologizer-In-
Chief’s’ Hits and Misses, Craig Bannister. March 8, 2012
(69) See chapter 3 reference #13.
(70) The Washington Times; Obama’s nation debt rate on track to double: Says raising debt limit ‘won’t add a dime’, David Boyer. October 9, 2013
(71) Reuters; Special ops groups attack Obama over bin laden bragging, leaks, Mark Hosenball. August 14, 2012
(72) The Lonely Conservative; Obama Flashback; The Surge Will Not Work, Lonely Conservative. August 31, 2010

Obama Flashback: The Surge Will Not Work

(73); 60% of U.S. Military Deaths in Afghanistan Have Occurred Since Obama Was Inaugurated in 2009, Edwin Mora. April 4, 2011
(74) Daily Mail; Is ruling in the genes? All presidents bar one are directly descended from a medieval English king, Snejana Farberov. August 5, 2012

Wait for the Downfall – Home – Governments Are Liars




© 2016 All Rights Reserved