It has been said that all Government is an evil. It would be more proper to say that the necessity of any Government is a misfortune. This necessity however exists; and the problem to be solved is, not what form of Government is perfect, but which of the forms is least imperfect.
Does the United States actually exist as the country we once knew, or is this nation really just some sort of transitional nation which is or will be called Amerika? The concept of our founding fathers, obviously, was to create a Constitutional Republic where men could pursue their dreams and live a life free from the twisted whims of tyrants. Of course, as we all know, nothing man-made lasts forever and it appears that dream is either dead or dying and at a rapid pace. I believe what we now have, is exactly what the framers fought to rid themselves of, a dictatorship run by petty demagogues in a so-called foreign nation which is now just called Amerika.
So just exactly what has transpired to foster this atmosphere, which has festered over time into this seamy dictatorship that would make King George proud? One factor is undoubtedly the misguided belief that the U.S. Constitution is a living Constitution which evolves over time. According to David A. Strauss, “A living Constitution is one that evolves, changes over time, and adapts to new circumstances, without being formally amended (1).”
Mr. Strauss explains some of the pros with regard to a living Constitution such as, “The cumbersome amendment process, the world has changed in incalculable ways, the nation has grown in territory and population, technology, the international situation, the economy and social mores,” are all different today. But he also touches on the cons, “The Constitution is supposed to be a rock-solid foundation, our basic principles-our constitutional principles-must remain constant, and the term…is hardly ever used, except derisively.”
So, although time moves on and the nation and the world changes, should the U.S. Constitution change? I believe the Law of the Land is just that and it should not be surreptitiously altered, by public opinion, liberal, conservative, communist, socialist or fascist agendas, or the whims of anyone, especially politicians. I believe a cumbersome amendment process is a good thing; it keeps politicians and judges from forcing their opinions and their laws down our throats just because they are in office or on the bench. However, that rock-solid foundation appears to be more like quick sand than anything else.
Obamacare is actually a good example of why a living Constitution is a bad idea. Whether we need some sort of overhaul regarding our health care system or not, is a matter that should be up to the States. Yet, somehow this immediately went to the Supreme Court to decide. In essence, doesn’t that remove State sovereignty? The University of Alabama Law Review states, “A problem for our time is that we cannot help knowing that our highest courts are not merely enforcing rules…We know too well that they often shape the rules…according to their own preferences to assist one rival interest or another (p. 4 of 68) (2).”
Something tells me if judges are supposed to be impartial referees, their own preferences should have absolutely nothing to do with enforcing rules. The Alabama Law Review goes on to state, “Justices sitting on the Supreme Court…have by the terms of their certiorari rule almost completely disowned responsibility for assuring that individuals’ legal rights and duties are actually enforced by lower courts in individual cases. They seldom bother to decide a case unless it has impact on some public interest…It decides only those cases which provide a suitable occasion for expressing policies the Justices choose to express (p. 5 of 68).”
It appears that the Supreme Court has, in effect, become an activist for political cause within the U.S. government. How is it possible to be an activist and impartial at the same time? Rather than allowing the States to decide an issue which is inherently an issue for the People of each sovereign State, the Supreme Court has decided that for us all; the Supreme Court’s usurpation of the Rights of each and every sovereign individual as well as each and every sovereign State is apparent.
If the U.S. government wishes to make a nationwide health care system, shouldn’t they be required to go through the extremely cumbersome amendment process in order to make that law? As far as I can tell, a national law, such as Obamacare, is much like an amendment to the Constitution, as it becomes (part of) the Law of the Land. Our individual sovereign status is being usurped, a status guaranteed to each of us in the U.S. Constitution through Republicanism. We can fight, but we can’t simply step away from this edict, because the self-serving type of politician which has decreed a national health care system, is the same type of politician which has decreed we are no longer a Republic, but a democracy where we are governed by force where the IRS is now in charge of healthcare. This is the malevolent effect of a living Constitution.
Lobbyists, special interest groups and Political Action Committees (3) are another form of decimation to the U.S. Constitution. They give the extremely wealthy organizations who can simply pay for votes a way to achieve their goals. I’m certain Machiavelli would be proud of our politicians, after all, to these types of people, the end justifies the means. However, if you stop to consider the Republic of the United States of America is not supposed to be a Machiavellian society where the Prince rules over the People with an iron fist, then there must be a problem.
What we now have, like it or not, is a nation which is sold to the highest bidder. Some of these PACs are for either the democratic or republican leadership, pro or anti-abortion policies, for gun control or gun rights. The list includes but isn’t limited to the AFL/CIO, the American Bankers Association, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Northrup Grumman, Lockheed Martin, the Boeing Co., the Stem Cell Action Fund, Exxon Mobil, Chevron Corp., BP, ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66, Sunoco Inc. and Halliburton. The amount of money PACs payed during the 2014 election cycle to either republican or democratic causes within the thirteen sectors was over $325 million, the figures for the 2012 election cycle were over $455 million for a total of over $780 million.
In essence, these groups attempt to influence the way which elected officials vote, which basically puts the politician in someone’s pocket. These groups also attempt to steer the country in one direction or another with no legal basis for their actions. Governance paid for by pressure groups is governance by force for the wealthy and unelected committee. This is not freedom. There are also over sixty-five foreign connected PACs which paid over $13 million during the 2014 election cycle, the figures for the 2012 election cycle were over $18 million for a total of over $31 million.
Foreign influence is truly the Grecian horse to a republic. We cannot be too careful to exclude its influence.
Another factor which I believe erodes our Constitution and the status of our nation are agreements such as NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), OAS (Organization of American States) and GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade), which is now called the WTO (World Trade Organization), and all are undoubtedly beholden to their masters at The World Bank. Organizations such as these can only tend to move jobs and money out of the United States to others around the world and leave us here, in the United States, in a position of poverty and servitude.
Americans no longer have a manufacturing base of well-paying jobs, we are stuck buying substandard products which are intended to break and be thrown on the junk heap, as well as further the misguided notion that we are the world’s policemen to protect the interests of corporations. All of this has been done at the cost of our bank accounts and our sovereignty. When will we see the White House, Congress, or the Supreme Court with giant neon company logos representing them, on our property?
While Americans are and have always been a people who are extremely generous, that generosity needs to come directly through the People as we see fit, not as the government sees fit. Organizations such as these, especially when given the blessings of our so-called leaders, can only chip away at our individual, State and national sovereignty.
I believe this is, in part, the New World Order. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, “Supporters of NAFTA, and many economists, see a positive impact on U.S. employment…But side effects of the treaty should not be ignored (4).” A senior fellow at the CFR stated, “Wages haven’t kept pace with labor productivity and that income inequality has risen in recent years…trade deals have hastened the pace of these changes in that they have “reinforced the globalization of the American economy.”” The Economic Policy Institute, an opponent to NAFTA stated, “We had balanced trade with Mexico and Canada before NAFTA, and a growing trade deficit after. But with the TPP countries, we are starting out far, far behind, with a $260 billion trade deficit (5).”
If Obama is successful in passing TPP, the Trans Pacific Partnership, and TTIP, the Transatlantic Trade Investment Partnership, that deficit will only get worse and the U.S. taxpayer will suffer the loss of jobs and lower wages. Those jobs will go to foreign nations with low-wages leaving the American worker in even worse shape than he is in right now.
Personally, I don’t like the idea of painful side effects or lower-paying jobs for Americans. According to a news article in August 2012, “The US government’s official unemployment rate, now at 8.3 percent, only takes into consideration those who have no jobs and are looking for work…this is called a “U-3″ rate…The national U-6 rate is 15.3 percent, but some states have a shockingly higher individual rate (6).” Data for December 2013 shows the U-3 rate at 6.7 percent and the U-6 rate at 13.1 percent, if you care to believe them or their figures (7).
I just cannot fathom how these so-called economic blocs are good for either U.S. workers or our economy. But with such a high unemployment rate, the wealthy politicians within the U.S. government still think we should allow others to come and take our jobs away from us. I defy anyone to prove to me that politicians in the U.S. aren’t crooks. In a report by POLITICO, “Two-hundred-and-thirty-seven members of Congress are millionaires. That’s 44 percent of the body – compared to about 1 percent of Americans overall (8).” Keep in mind that was nearly five years ago, the figure is undoubtedly higher today. Yet these individuals believe they know what is best for the People of the United States.
I believe other factors which further this agenda are an overly perverted immigration policy, the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA and even TSA. If we look at our immigration policy, the word amnesty is used far too often. The Washington Post reports, “Under the new policy, as many as 1.4 million undocumented immigrants under age 30 will be able to apply for the amnesty (9).” It appears the federal government doesn’t have a problem with the 1.4 million undocumented immigrants, which is a euphemism for people who broke U.S. law by entering the United States illegally.
If 1.4 million are eligible, how many others are there who are also here breaking our laws? Apparently, the Department of Homeland Security (the name itself smacks of Soviet style language) doesn’t see this as a threat to our sovereignty. But I have to wonder why? Isn’t it their duty to protect the homeland against invasion? If it isn’t, then why have they ordered 450 million rounds of ammunition from ATK? If it isn’t to keep illegal invasion from happening, perhaps it’s for some underhanded reason which has yet to come to light.
We already know all too well what FEMA’s position is with regard to Americans. During Hurricane Katrina, they stood by and did nothing while Americans died and lived in squalor in New Orleans and many still do. In a PBS NEWSHOUR report, Senator Lieberman stated, “But government failures…allowed much more human suffering and property destruction to occur than should have (10).” Louisiana Governor Blanco’s press secretary stated, “We wanted helicopters, food and water. They wanted to negotiate an organizational chart.”
How pathetic is that? It wouldn’t surprise me one bit if FEMA, which was incorporated into the Department of Homeland Security in 2003, was in league with the rest of the federal government in an attempt to assist in the formation of a new North American Union, made up of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, after all, they are doing quite a good job of turning the United States into a Third World Nation.
A report by Jerome Corsi stated, “Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration really wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.” The report goes on to state, “President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union.” The report concludes, “His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union (11).”
The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to rigorously enforce existing immigration laws. “Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won’t do.” As previously stated, it appears President Obama is on board with this same idea. He also refuses to secure the border with Mexico and he refuses to enforce existing immigration laws. Neither the Bush nor the Obama administrations are friends of the sovereignty of United States of America. “The number of unaccompanied, undocumented immigrants who are under 18 will likely double in 2015 to nearly 130,000 and cost U.S. taxpayers $2 billion, up from $868 million this year, according to administration estimates (12).”
Quite frankly, I believe this goes back even further. Something tells me George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama are all cut from the exact same piece of cloth. Plots such as these do not hatch themselves overnight, but take decades to form and implement. Could this lead to a complete loss of our Rights guaranteed to us under the U.S. Constitution? Would the U.S. Constitution even exist under such a system? While it isn’t much of a secret that the United States has been bankrupt by our leaders; our outstanding public debt as of August 28, 2012 is $15,988,985,503,358.85 (13).
Would such a ploy by the federal government con-artists of this former Republic be for such a simple reason as to gain new taxpayers? I can’t believe it would really matter. Without the United States or the U.S. Constitution, we would be nothing more than slaves to our usurpers, who already are nothing more than puppets of their masters, the so-called illuminated ones.
Where would the central power of such a Union be located? I have no doubt the central power would temporarily be somewhere in North America. I can’t help but imagine some sort of triune would be set-up. After all, the United States has already proven their affection for trinities; the false trinity of Nimrod-Semiramis-Tammuz is a good example of that. Just look at the Statue of Liberty (Semiramis), or Minerva atop the dome of the U.S. Capitol building and Mars (Nimrod) at the door. But undoubtedly, the central power would eventually be shifted, or should I say freely given to the Vatican. This is simply a precursor to a One World Government; a New World Order which has been envisioned by certain extremely wealthy families for thousands of years.
Before you laugh too hard, perhaps you should take a moment and think about the ramifications of such an idea. Ask yourselves if the Constitution and your Rights have been slowly eroded by the U.S. government, extremely wealthy multi-national banks and corporations? It’s funny how they seem to get bailed-out by us, but we get shafted by them. By them I do mean the governments, corporations and the banks.
Tell me, are the secrets which are enthusiastically and fastidiously guarded by our fictional leaders for the protection of the nation, which means the People of the United States, or are they kept for the protection of the ruling elite? I submit that these secrets are maintained because the People would most likely revolt if they knew the truth. These deceivers know they can continue to spoon-feed us lies and they know we will accept the continuation of those lies because they are easier to swallow that the truth.
Don’t be fooled by the many families of those who have prepared for countless millennia for their thousand points of light. It’s not the light which they seek, although they call themselves the illuminated ones (14). They seek darkness; famine, war, disease, slavery and death, all in the unholy name of their master who yearns for our wanton obedience to feed his desire for the power to control and destroy. Be assured, these people and their master seek to enthrall others by any means available, but they prefer to receive this through our free-will. Treachery and deception are a small part of the arsenal from which their cabal ensnares others into taking their mark freely by thoughts and beliefs as well as acts and deeds (15).
We have allowed this to happen and if we don’t fix the problem, and soon, it will be fixed whether we like it or not. Now is the time to wake up. The chains of mental, physical and spiritual slavery, which unknowingly have been fastened around our throats with the sole intent of dragging us down into the depths of the abyss where they reside, need to be quickly and forcefully removed. It’s never too late to come to our senses and do what’s right and save ourselves and our Republic.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.
(1) The University of Chicago: The Law School Alumni; The Living Constitution, David A. Strauss. Fall 2010
(2) Alabama Law Review: Volume 50, Winter 1999, Number 2; Restoring Vitality to State and Local Politics by Correcting the Excessive Independence of the Supreme Court, Paul D. Carrington. February 9, 1998
(3) OpenSecrets.org: Center For Responsive Politics; Influence and Lobbying: PACs by Industry. Based on data by the FEC July 21, 2014
(4) Council on Foreign Relations; NAFTA’S Economic Impact, Mohammed Aly Sergie. February 14, 2014
(5) Economic Policy Institute: Research and Ideas for Shared Prosperity; Report: Trade and Globalization; White House Wrong On Fast Track: Massive Trade Deals Cost Jobs, Depress Wages, Robert E. Scott. February 5, 2014
(6) RT Question More; Real US Unemployment: More Than 15%. August 3, 2012
(7) CNBC; Chart of the Day: The real unemployment rate? Ben Berkowitz. January 10, 2014
(8) POLITICO; Report: 237 millionaires in Congress, Erika Lovely. November 6, 2009
(9) The Washington Post; Young illegal immigrants’ amnesty could tighten competition for jobs, college, Pamela Constable. June 15, 2012
(10) PBS NEWSHOUR; FEMA Faces Intense Scrutiny, Anna Shoup. September 9, 2005
(11) Human Events: Powerful Conservative Voices; North American Union to Replace USA, Jerome Corsi. May 19, 2006
(12) Reuters; Waves of immigrant minors present crisis for Obama, Congress, Richard Cowen. May 28, 2014
(13) Brillig; National Debt Clock, Ed Hall.
(14) henrymakow.com; Illuminati Defector Details Pervasive Conspiracy, Henry Makow PhD. October 14, 2002
(15) rense.com; 1990s Illuminati Game Cards Still Creating Controversy, From Wikipedia. November 21, 2011
© 2016 All Rights Reserved